But one thing is certain, he jumped into a conclusion without studying well the concept of bitcoin and how it becomes an advantage to some open-minded people. If only he is born in this millennial era, I bet he will change his current perspective on bitcoin. But what else can we do but to leave him for that, and let the success of bitcoin and all its believers serve as the proofs that bitcoin is never part of ponzi scheme, and it never was.
How are you certain he jumped into conclusion without understanding the concept of Bitcoin?
I'm certain he understands the concept more than many that believes in Bitcoin
Bitcoins alternatives are in line with his belief that I won't argue
Everybody with their own beliefs and conclusions after analysing a data
It's normal in life there are always different school of thoughts
I doubt he meant Bitcoin
But if he does
Then Bitcoin is the most beautiful and safest ponzi scheme in the world.
There's a thin line between a mad Genius and a foolish man
Only time will tell which is which.