The mines don't benefit the local communities, but it give benefit to Arkansas Governor and the states.

However, the laws said they only allow Bitcoin mines if they have comply with the noise ordinances.


I hear that in developed countries, US is the example, you can easily sue anyone despite you're poor, as long as you're correct, you will win, why did the neighbors not sue it?

There are pros and cons but if big mining farms are too closely to urban areas or where locals are living with high density, I believe that there will be more regulatory rules in future to solve these issues and negative impacts of Bitcoin mining activities on locals.

Like many other industries, there will be regulations, more and stricter with time but there is no reason to ban Bitcoin mining industry so my belief goes to good survival and existence of Bitcoin mining farms, under future Acts, Laws and Regulations.

There will be solutions to reduce Cons, and increase Pros, but companies in any industry will not proactively do this. They often wait for official regulations from governments to adjust their industry streams and infrastructures to satisfy requirements. With Bitcoin mining industry, we will witness same progress in future.

What are the miners’ union saying? Are they still playing deaf?

https://umwa.org/contact-us/

People need to wake them up.

Not everything is a political issue. China banned Bitcoin and Bitcoin mining effectively forcing some of the miners to shift from China to US where prices are competitive enough. It is not a political tool used by either country.

It is important to note that the migration also changed the composition of renewable energy being used by miners according to some estimates.