Trump publicly supported bitcoin and later also chose a pro-bitcoin vice presidential candidate. Meanwhile, Harris chose to continue down the path Biden forged by opposing bitcoin and cryptocurrency. That's why I think there's no reason for us to vote for any democratic candidate when they always find ways to fight us. It would be bad if she took Biden's place because there wouldn't be any beneficial changes for us.

Her choosing an anti-crypto candidate could be a move to tell us that we will be in even more trouble if she gets elected, I hope everyone will know to vote for who.

As we all know, Trump has been displaying a pro bitcoiner with his expressed visions towards the future of Bitcoin and then, he has also picked a Co. Pro JD Vance as his running mate
Trump’s VP pick is the first ever ‘bitcoiner’ on a presidential

While Trump has secured some confidence on the Bitcoin communities, I personally don't want to hope that the course of this US election would bridge relationship between Bitcoin enthusiasts and non Bitcoin enthusiasts because I don't understand the necessity of the cartels being Anti bitcoiner.

So if the Democrats think it is a winning strategy to be surrounded with the Anti bitcoiners, then it is obvious that they don't have good plans towards the future of Bitcoin and that alone becomes a point to their failure in the anticipating US election because they are being enemies of a global economy progressions on the hedge at Bitcoin technology.

Kamala is anti-bitcoin. Whoever supports her in the upcoming elections is supporting the enemies of Bitcoin.

A vote for Kamala is a bullet sent to bitcoin.

Save Bitcoin. Vote TRUMP.

If we are to go by what we seen and expect to happen, Trump will win and everything is showing already towards his direction as indications over him gaining ground already, Kamala may try and put in every efforts, but i think its better that she realized this may not be her turn yet, instead, she have to come back the next time after which she must have also gained the necessary ground on being recognized, i don't want to know her strategy or the collaboration she is making, it may not be her time yet.

Regardless of whether he made the VP post or not, his hates on cryptocurrency can stop anything because their chances to win in the election is slim and again even if they did win, it will definitely mean that he be needing alot to be able to execute his hate on cryptocurrency, as United States is not just any place where some politicians can just make laws that affects it citizens.
And even at any level, I am sure that cryptocurrencies like bitcoin and other decentralised coins won't be affected in whatever anti crypto laws that he be making in office, going back to the election and the chances of winning for the last time, I think Trump have upper hands and he has been in the news lately and all because of his firendly approach towards bitcoin and the entire cryptocurrency industry, although there will definitely be some regulations and the hodlers of this coins will be losing they privacy for those leaving in the USA but at the end we will be having bitcoin at mainstream level if he eventually won the election.

I would not be surprised that most of them pushing against bitcoin enlightened leadership are secretly holding Bitcoin and are deceiving their followers to think they don't take part in Crypto activities from behind. I just pitty the uninformed people singing their praise at this moment  instead of them pushing for a sound and broad leadership.

The masses already know who they would vote. They say experience is a teacher and I believe they must have learnt their lesson and are preparing to effect a major corrections this time around through their vote power.

So far, the buzz around Donald Trump re-election is echoing very loud that the deaf can hear it very well. I think a win for Donald Trump is a win for the Crypto community as a whole.

JD Vance comes off to me as a goofball and I think this is one of the blunders that Trump has made with his campaign this year. He should've chosen Marco Rubio or Tim Scott instead, or at least someone else without his profile.

Wouldn't surprise me if the anti-Trump history of this guy ends up tanking his campaign. It's like he's running against 2 running mates.

Oh.  But the guy who keeps spamming on every single Elections related Thread that 'Bitcoin has increased by 500 percent under president Biden' would strongly disagree with you.  I wonder where he is now!

It is evident that, strictly based on how Bitcoin was treated and how its Price acted, Trump is the leaning choice.  I am not sure at all that Bitcoin would do just as well under his Presidency again, but that is a guarantee nobody can give.  Particularly as Trump has a history of being strongly against Bitcoin and recently only suddenly switched the flip.  But I am almost convinced Bitcoin does better in this Election if Trump is chosen than the clear, bold hatred displayed by Democrats for Bitcoin.

Yes, I totally agree to this very statement of yours as shown above, because looking at this from a standard point of view, I must say that Trump is only at the side of Bitcoin today, simply because he is not the current president of the United States and intends to be one in the forth coming election, which I why I guess he decided to dive into the crypto phase, knowing fully well how strong this community is. So let's not be deserved, as if really Trump is as good as how you people claimed, just point out just 3 things Trump did during his time as the president of the United States?