I don't think he is bluffing. I think Trump means what he says. He wants to reduce the energy prices though that's the most important promise he made about crypto because bitcoin uses electricity to function. Cheap energy means more miners can contribute and that means more hash rate. More hash rate means a more decentralized and more secure mining network.

Do you think he can't bring electricity prices down? I think he can.

Let's go with the worst possibility though; He never liked bitcoin and he was bluffing. What's the other option? Kamala? A certified crypto hater? No thank you. I'd rather take my chances with Trump.

I would assume he got the crypto as payment, e.g. in exchange for some secret documents he sold to our enemies. I too doubt that he actually took it upon himself to buy ETH.

The organizers of the BTC conference invited him to give a speech at the program, they do not represent the BTC community and i don't think it is correct to say the BTC community has given their support to Donald Trump. However, i have to agree that he has got the support of so many bitcoiners of late, a lot of them believe all the things he has been saying, do i believe it? No, but i will just wait and see, because i could be wrong.

Politicians are known for play roles of lies and not talk and do. I'm not sure about the legacy of Donald Trump but he work during his time as President of the united state and fulfill many of his campaign promises. Aside from the way he talk and things said to people arrogantly, he made sure to do what he promised people and I'm sure his intention is genuine about Bitcoin too, he want to get to the office through the help of Bitcoin community too.

However, my only problem is that Bitcoin has alot of enemies within the US and many rich elite wouldn't watch and let Bitcoin be allowed so wealth distribution doesn't leave them. If Bitcoin becomes the power of the commoners, many people that got rich though their own stocks and centralized system will be angry and people wouldn't worship them like they are doing now in the future.

Yep, the survey data doesn't guarantee for the result. It is just the current prediction, voters still have time to consider changing their choice. If you check again my post above, I never claimed anything about who will win the president election. Sure, Trump is possible to win it although the current survey is on his side. Sometimes the survey institution or media can be very subjective, we can't fully trust the survey data.

I personally think there is a chance. It may be not as sweet as his promise but he is probably trying to make a more friendly policy for crypto industry. However, if Kamala becomes the next president, I think there will be no much change in crypto policy. But we can't suspect that the crypto industry will be worse even if Kamala is elected. The US government also has an interest in crypto, they get taxes from crypto. The crypto industry also helps the growth of the economic sector in the US. It is not really surprising if they consider to treat crypto with a more friendly way.

I know it. But someone can change his mind due to political interests. I don't say US government will be totally friendly to crypto industry suddenly. I just assume there is a chance that US government will be a more friendly with crypto industry because they actually get advantages if crypto industry can be developed in US.

IMO

If Trump is ever given a chance to win to become president of the US again, when he implements the above, it will be a good sign when that happens. And that's in favor of all of us bitcoin and crypto communities around the world.

Especially if he can do the third thing you said, pal, because that has a big impact on all crypto enthusiasts in this field of business, in my opinion.

I think he's fucking with us and the gullibility of the average US voter to garner as much votes as he can, and as Joe Budden says in his hit skit in Loiter Squad, as soon as shit hits the fan he's gonna leave our asses out in the wind, promises unkept, and we can't do shit about it cause he's the president.

I urge people to be more smart when it comes to choosing their next president, and not vote for someone with piles upon piles of criminal paperwork stacked against them cause that's one good recipe for a disastrous presidential run and 6 years, but then again we're already fighting the same war here in the Philippines with some incompetent fuckwads seated in the top positions of the Philippine Government so I guess until it concerns us, you Americans are on your own. LOL.

Okay, I looked: Bitcoin went up 500% under president Biden.

I think most Bitcoin investors would be very happy if things "stayed the same" and Bitcoin went up another 500% under Harris.

The only reason to hate on Democrats is because you want abortion to be illegal in the USA, not because anything related to Bitcoin.

I imagine these two candidates are going to keep flip-flopping between 50% until election day.

The polls are very tight (although they always seem to be at this time of the year), but let's not forget that it isn't the popular vote that's going to elect the next president, but the electoral vote. And we don't know yet who is going to have the upper hand here as the numbers keep changing.

But the thing is that those politicians, not just in the US, really know to wake up the interest of their voters to go and vote for them. And obviously, we have seen what Donald J Trump is doing here, he uses Bitcoin to his advantage to even mentioned it as part of their political agenda.

But then again, we don't know if we can trust him on this or not, still up to us whether we will vote for him just because of his pro-crypto stance, or we are going to choose the lesser of two evil and then hope for the best in the next 4 years for crypto in the US.