Third option: nobody really cares with politicians accepting Bitcoin for donations, for the same reason nobody really cares with politicians accepting money in general for donations.

I just talked about a similar discussion in a related topic I contributed now. The fact that these USA politicians are becoming more aware and deliberate about the bitcoin community makes it more interesting to hear. It is also the time that these communities have to negotiate with the candidates over some of their policies and plans they intend to implement when they are finally voted into the government. These bitcoin communities must be bold enough to make these bold steps since their significants in the overall population of the country is becoming more noticeable every day.

Elections will come and pass, but what's important is the roundtable discussions and negotiations with these candidates. Trump have shown a great deal of interest in the bitcoin community and have appealed for their support, Kamala will also do the same at least for their own interests in winning the votes from those boards, now, the people should also organize themselves and show their interests have tete-a-tete conversations and bring in proposals too. I dont know if I'm making enough sense in this though but that's my thoughts on this.

Trump's supporters don't merely focus on abortion. It's also about anti-migration approach, isolationist foreign policy approach, anti-environmental approach. People who are planning to vote for Trump will not choose Harris, even if she promises a crypto-friendly future for the US. But it's still good that Democrats will try to help Harris out by organizing something pro-crypto in the near future. It might sway the voters who don't want to vote for Trump but genuinely care about cryptos.
It will be good to make it look like Bitcoin is not a partisan issue, so that people can focus on other things when making their voting decisions.

For a moment I pondered whether we are happy with bitcoin involvement in the political realm where they themselves only use the crypto community voice to gain support solely for their personal interests and groups in parliament. This has indeed happened and will continue until November, will the community voice after this election get space to submit ideas to politicians? There are always 2 sides that bind between being good news or vice versa. In the US the crypto community situation is divided because 2 candidates are trying to carry the same concept in treating Bitcoin.

Now they became crypto friendly when they need the vote of people?

People didn't forget about what Biden and his camp did to crypto. For sure that there's no people in right mind who use crypto will fall in their trap and provably they use that crypto for Harris or anything related to word like that just to trick people and also to possible get their votes.

For sure people will vote  on Trump since aside from he is more lesser evil among those candidate for sure he would never put any heavy restriction towards the usage or circulation of crypto in their country.

Also about whole isolation and all that, they just don't want to help Ukraine, and they do want to continue helping Israel, which means that they are not really isolating themselves, they just want to help the ones they want to help but not to help ones they don't want to help.

If it was bombing some middle east nation, I am sure that trump supporters will love it, but when it comes to helping out Europe, they do not like that idea one bit. I feel like it is not always clear what they are talking about, like for example if it is about preserving some good natural place, like some park, some canyon whatever, they are all about it and love to do that, but if it is about installing solar panels? They are anti-environment.

So they do not look at a subject and have one idea about everything, they take it subject by subject, and decide on that. Abortion is one thing they are certain about though, they hate it and that is a platform for sure, and that is going to be a tough deal to handle. Because between borders issue and abortion issue, we are going to see a lot of changes in this, and Kamala vs Trump is based on this two issue mainly, not crypto, not anything else, just abortion and border control.

News update on crypto for harris campaign.

Kamala's promise in supporting the cryptospace if she has the victory is certainly optimistic, however, it appears that some of the executives of some companies in the cryptospace are quite skeptical. According to a founder of a crypto investment firm, these are only hollow words.

It appears that this skepticism might be caused by the Biden administration's anticrypto agenda. It might be difficult for her to tell the people that she will do better than the present administration because she is one of the leaders of the present administration.



Harris, the Democratic nominee for president, just name-dropped crypto for the second time this week.

At a campaign event In Pennsylvania on Wednesday, the vice president said the US should become “dominant” in blockchain, as well as other technologies such as artificial intelligence and quantum computing.

The shout-out is striking given the crackdown the Biden Administration has pursued in the industry over the last three years.

Indeed, one of the main reasons why Coinbase, Kraken, the Winklevoss twins and other crypto mavens have raised millions for pro-crypto candidates is to rebuff the efforts of Gary Gensler, the chair of the US Securities and Exchange Commission, and other Biden appointees.

Even though Harris is suddenly making nice with crypto, industry insiders aren’t convinced she will be any better for the industry.

“Hollow words,” Jon Charbonneau, co-founder of crypto investment firm DBA, said on X. “Same stuff Biden said in 2022.”

Charbonneau was referring to the Biden administration’s executive order on ensuring the responsible development of digital assets, which promised to “support technological advances that promote responsible development and use of digital assets.”

‘It’s OK to vote for Kamala, but please don’t pretend she’s pro-crypto.’
—  Hasu

Read in full https://www.dlnews.com/articles/people-culture/crypto-industry-dismisses-kamala-harris-blockchain-comments/

there has been large amount of crypto supporter that willing to put their vote if any party is supporting BTC, i've seen so many especially in twitter that actually care about which candidate are pro-bitcoin but honestly don't really know the real amount.
since frankly speaking, anyone can voice their opinion on twitter but not everyone is eligible voter . so it might be an illusion.

but overall, I think bitcoin will only have win from this, getting exposure from both party seems like a good idea for bitcoin in the long run, it kinda gives the vibe bitcoin is already known by everyone.

So they secretly want to end crypto? Is this the latest conspiracy theory you have been told to believe by the Republicans?

It sure is strange that in the last four years they haven't ended crypto, that the US is the leading country for crypto mining, crypto is bigger than ever here, that there are ETFs and other new financial products, and that... Bitcoin went up 500%. All under this supposedly evil regime that secretly hates crypto even though they don't publicly admit it or follow through with actual actions that negatively effect the market.

People who want Trump to be president will use crypto (and basically anything else they can think of) as an excuse to vote for Trump, and an excuse to campaign for Trump here and elsewhere.

As for who wants Trump to be president and who doesn't here, I suspect that it's roughly the same as the US at large, e.g. 50/50. Obviously, based on your childish slurs, you are a Trump supporter. But not all Americans are.