No.

That is just a wallet that has a similar beginning and ending characters, and it can easily be generated using a tool such as VanitySearch but without the private key, as long as the checksum matches up with the rest of the address.

I said without the private key because it's the only way you can fly through the combinations and find one in reasonable time.

this is what i m looking for thanks for sharing i m doing some research

I’ve noticed people like to try and match the beginning and ending of wallet addresses and pretend they’re connected. I’ve even had people send me transactions from similar wallets with low fees so they never confirm (there’s 1 pending now). I believe they do this in the hopes someone using a block explorer accidentally copies the address from the wrong spot to send them BTC or something. Who knows… Weird that people spend their time doing such things.

To naive for those people to fall from these kind of scam attempts since if they fall victim on address baiting them that means they have lack of experience towards how they deal with certain scenarios and they need to improve their selves to avoid being a victim of scam for second time.

Verifying is always important to know the real address to look for and avoid being fooled by this attempt or committing bad mistakes for copying the the fake address. Scammers would do all the methods they know since they are trying to catch the carelessness of people and take advantage with that situation then get something from them.

I do not see anything similar or look alike there. It is never possible that there would be similar wallets at the same time. This is likely the reasons why transactions are made into the wrong wallets as the ending and beginning looks or starts with the same alphabet or number. This is  also why the needs to always cross check wallet address before making any transaction so that one does not mistakenly send assets  to the wrong wallet thinking it is the real one they sent it to.

So therefore, you did not find any twin wallet. If you check well in between the wallets address, you would notice the difference and that alone discredit and also disqualifies it from being a twin wallet and I believe the private keys are not same and would never be the same.

Yeah this is called address poisioning but its commonly only used under Ethereum or their L2 networks. Maybe its a issue with Solana also. Never had an address poisoning before on the bitcoin network.

The way it works is as follows, you send a transaction to a specific address, and a few minutes later an similar transaction is send from your wallet, however it sends 0 ETH so due to the way the network is designed, it appears in the block explorer.

You a few months later want to send to that same address, and you quickly copy the latest transaction because it looks similar and it ends up being the scammers address. This has been going around for 2 years now. If bitcoin fees are going to be super low, then I can see it happening on the bitcoin network also but it wont appear as a sent transaction because that bug doesnt work on the bitcoin network.

The example tool; VanitySearch can actually do that with: ./vanitysearch -stop 1A1***Na command. (with the private key)
And you'll get a result in less than a second too, given that you have a decent hardware; otherwise, within a minute.

No, that is why users should check most (if too lazy to check all) of the characters of the address when copy-pasting
Because there are some advanced clipboard-hijacking malware/viruses that can do exactly that by utilizing such "vanity address" generator's code.