I believe most would agree that Bitcoin is an asset, apart from those who are very strong on the case that Bitcoin is totally useless. Bitcoin is digital, but that's not a problem. Bitcoin is useful, it is valuable, it can be easily exchanged for fiat money to pay debt or other financial obligations. That covers multiple definitions of an asset, so I agree that maybe not all cryptos fit these definitions, but Bitcoin does.
Of course, some might stress the point that Bitcoin isn't an asset for a different reason: they believe that Bitcoin is money, so it should not be classified as an asset (if you believe that the USD is not an asset, at least in terms of financial regulations and for tax purposes). That is also reasonable, although I think we can't deny that Bitcoin is often used as an asset, so even though it can also be used as money, I don't believe it means it's not an asset.
Bitcoin is originally designed as a currency. But more than that, it can also be a digital asset that appreciates its value overtime. Although not all would realized this, but until they weren't into deeply investing into bitcoin, they wouldn't know that bitcoin is a real digital asset that we can always gain advantage if we are knowledgeable enough on how to manage such volatile investment.
As for me, those that have given value and long-term utilization will always be considered an asset, whether its digital or physical assets like real estate.