yes it would be fine, but it would be much better if Trump wins this election. because you can see how trump promised that he will give the best to bitcoin in the american market and he will give bitcoin a chance to grow better there, in the long term of course this is very good for the development of bitcoin. while kamala did not promise anything good to bitcoin, instead she focused more on racial and lgbt issues which I think is disgusting. and you can't expect much in the future of bitcoin under her administration if she wins.

Of course the two candidates are making different promises on Bitcoin so whichever one of these two candidates is elected I think will definitely be good for Bitcoin. Electoral votes have started coming in from various states, so far Donald Trump is ahead. Donald Trump is likely to become president. Only time will tell whether the promises made on Bitcoin will come true if Donald Trump is elected president.

Democrat and Republic has been the face of US elections for many years but you want the truth, Robbert Kenedy would have made a good choice in my opinion. The rest of the candidate stole that brilliant idea of Bitcoin support from him and suddenly they added it to their campaign starretgy because they wanted to carry every sector along just to win the election. Even Kamala didn't recognize Bitcoin until later after Trump has made all it's support for Bitcoin.

There is two things these two candidates will do, if Trump should win this election, that guy will be focus on getting his revenge than do the things he has promised and if Kamala win, she will be focus on what her paymaster told her to do. She definitely don't get to say what she want but the canals will tell her what to do and that means America isn't on her hands but on the hands on the people of the high tavel which is why till now, I don't like neither of them.

Actually in this case even though there have been remarks from Trump does not mean that it will also make bitcoin a thing that will indeed have a big advantage in the end because regardless of whoever in the end becomes president bitcoin will remain in its path without being able to intervene on both sides even though for now Kamala and Trump have different views where this is like an opposite magnet between each other.

Talking about temporary market impact will definitely still exist because after all this is like a battle of bitcoin opponents and bitcoin supporters so when the opponents win the market will be a little shaky for a while and vice versa when supporters win the market will start to lead to better things. But it is only temporary because in the end it is just the reaction of some traders who create new bubbles for personal gain by utilizing the presidential election as one of the means to profit.

I will agree that Donald Trump is more experienced since he has contested for presidential elections three times. Kamala Harris had a joint ticket with Joe Biden and this is her first experience as a presidential aspirant.

However, we cannot conclude that Trump is ahead of Harris politically. The female presidential hopeful was better in the presidential debate and both of them have almost equal scores in most polls.

Don't assume that Trump will win the elections because he is supporting the crypto industry. The members of the crypto community will contribute insignificant votes to the election because we don't have a large population. And other important issues will determine the outcome of this election. Americans are more concerned about immigration, abortion, LGBT rights, foreign policy, and gun ownership laws than Bitcoin. Bitcoin is just part of economic policies.

Of course Bitcoin will be fine. But it won't rise that quickly with the adninistration's "anti-crypto" rhetoric. Gary Gensler's actions (SEC chairman and a Democrat) caused many crypto exchanges and companies to move away from America. Trump has been frequently labeled as a "pro-crypto President", so him winning the race will lead BTC towards new heights. Or should I say, Bitcoin will rise faster if Trump wins. Actually, Trump is the projected winner of the presidential race. So nothing should stop BTC from going all the way to Mars. I think $100k is now closer than we've thought.

Anyhow, there's no denying Bitcoin will stand the test of time thanks to the way it was designed. If someday America abandons it, Bitcoin will just blossom somewhere else. It's a "global currency", after all. A bright future awaits for all Bitcoiners.

I won't be surprised if that is his agenda, but I don't think that is the case here. After all every presidential candidate would hold on to one thing the masses cherish the most and promise them heaven on earth in other to win the election. No doubt, Trump had a lot of support from the Bitcoin communities out there. Both in social media and social gatherings. The miners, traders, and largely the investors (Both aspiring and current) were in full support of Trump. He has won let's see what's next.

Please don't mention about centralization. Trump's win cannot push for centralization, it's impossible. Let's just hope that the market will be bullish soon enough. Anything other than that I cannot tell.

Agree. Actually my only real hope about a Trump administration is that regulation could be a bit laxer in the area of privacy/KYC requirements. The problem is that I also expect a laxer regulation in the area of investment protection, at least initially. The CeDeFi surge (e.g. Uniswap) after his victory is already hinting at this: centralized "DeFi" projects, and probably also exchanges offering very dubious services like "Bitcoin staking", could be among those most benefitted by this change. And these projects have extremely risky components. For now, Gensler is still in office but we'll see.

You could however be right about that another big scam like FTX could again pressure the Trump administration to a stricter regulation again.

I think the crypto community, above all of course the US crypto community, should now be especially wary about dubious offerings in the "crypto industry" and teach beginners how to avoid them. I will probably for example continue to analyze the launch fairness of altcoins, and I think similar initiatives (for example in the layer-2 "industry" BitcoinLayers) do make even more sense now.

Regarding the Harris campaign, I believe it was an error to be that vague about her crypto policy. She could and should have been bolder, and then perhaps she would have got that 1-2% more in important states she needed. In the end, it's true that Trump could successfully market himself as "the pro-crypto president", and I believe many crypto investors could have decided their vote accordingly, above all those without strong ideologic convictions.

I think the EU or even China, Trump's upcoming stance will be the deciding factor in whether they change their stance on bitcoin or not . If Trump is serious about promoting bitcoin in the US , other countries will do the same.
Recently, German MP Joana Cota also said that if the United States buys bitcoin as a national reserve , Europe will also FOMO . In addition , the trade war between China and the United States will continue under Trump , China will have to legalize cryptocurrencies if it does not want to suffer more serious damage .  Although there is no official information yet, rumors about China lifting the cryptocurrency ban are spreading more and more.
In my opinion ,  the future of bitcoin in banned countries will depend on the attitude of the Trump administration , if they use it as a strategy , the rest of the world will have to follow them .

https://x.com/BoldBitcoin/status/1854720526008061987