In this life, things could happened the way we don't expect, we have to see it as something more of taking a cognizance observation for, whereby in some situations, you will discover that some are using a particular energy they would have invested on something qualitative on what is not of useful to them and others, which also means that, there is more efforts needed in doing what is wrong to doing what is right.

That's a surprising analysis, I'm quite surprised that the energy released by the Hiroshima Bomb was quite much despite been in such era.
Well method are been implemented to improve energy efficiency in Bitcoin through the use of renewable sources like wind.
Despite mining difficulty increasing consumption, development has been able to keep up/outpace the rate of consumption.

I guess they can't really be compared while one is an ongoing process to offer financial freedom, the other is instantaneous that took lives.

If only the Japs had Bitcoin back in WW2 times.     

Another idea that can be used by those who promote the agenda of BTC mining as something that consumes huge amounts of electricity and also contributes to global warming. I personally have nothing against comparisons, but only if things are put into a wider context, so for example it would be good if you calculated how much energy the world banking system consumes in one year, or how much electricity is lost every year - the last time I looked at the data the estimate was around 50 000 TWh.

Bitcoin is at the bottom of the pyramid, from any angle we look at it - otherwise things would be much less favorable for Bitcoin and all of us.

power stations are not built for current/at the time consumption needs, but instead the consumption needs of the next few decades. and so instead of having low demand/consumption initially(running at 10% capacity) these power stations happily sell upto the other 90% to anyone that wants it, and they do it at a discount(thus power companies get ROI of build cost faster (years instead of decades))

many asic farms already know this and for the last decade have set up facilities within range/region of these power plants and do special deal purchases of energy in 2 year locked contracts thus get a great price for energy to cover a lifecycle of their asic farm before they upgrade their asics to the next gen and then buy new contracts of energy.

these reciprocal relationships between power stations with available excess energy and asic farms, have been a known thing even as far as the first gen asics of 2013