So this is better than Starlink. Because with Starlink, where the atmosphere is cloudy, it affects the speed while for Sceye, it's on the stratosphere which is an outer layer of the Earth and it covers better than Starlink. It is a good technology but we have to see how it is going to be first the first 5 years of its operation. It is solar powered and for sure engineers of it have already made preventive measures for things that might come to it. But then, its technology is still young but promising. I wonder how will the solar flare conspiracists will say about it.

I'm interested to read your thoughts Jet about this aside from the questions that you've asked. I've mentioned it because that's what I've been seeing in my feed.

This will definitely challenge Starlink. They’re dominating in the satellite internet market, and with their massive resources, I’m sure they’ll find a way to compete. However, since this new technology isn’t live yet, it’s hard to say if it will truly be a threat to Starlink. But given its claim of offering better internet connections, even during natural disasters, this innovation could spark stronger competition in the market. Currently, Starlink charges $50 for a residential plan in our country, so it’ll be interesting to see how expensive or affordable this new technology will be in terms of subscription fees.

I think the price will not be competitive if what is offered is a claim of resistance to natural disasters. Starlink is currently very good and its users are increasing. but the claim is better in natural disasters are quite bold. in terms of price, I am sure it will be more expensive. because they also have to provide insurance for their users, I mean the device.
I don't know how far technology will develop in the future. currently for those who enjoy technology from the 90s until now. there have been many surprising technological advances, and in the future maybe technological advances could be even crazier.

That's a well saying. The most relevance of this Sceye HAPS airship internet technology is basically on the benefits that it covers a wide range of providing internet access which literally it's advantage for internet users is that it serves as boosters of optimizing Internet capacities.
But it can't be undermined to we're free from internet disruption by the technology because the technology is built by human and still requires natural resources as the sun for energy sustainability which means of the temperature is not enough to conserve energies, then the system would began to loose its velocity of power sustainments.
Moreover, it can be hunted my some anti's since it's an stratosphere technology mounted in the air.

I also have some reservations. The cost of buying the Sceye HAPS airship might make it unaffordable to many. Except a community might put funds together to finance the acquisition. Which means it might not be okay for people who live in mobile homes.

This source of power might be complex to operate. You might spend time learning how to effectively use the internet airship.

I am also concerned about the maintenance. For people living in Africa, it might be expensive to bring in experts or get spare parts to fix it when it becomes faulty.

It could also attract unnecessary attention. As a new invention, your house might become a tourist site where everyone will want to view this strange object. For introverts, it wouldn't be a good experience.

I don't think that there will be ever a situation where there will be prolonged power outage or Internet outage provided we are caught in a World War etc, other than this, there are many alternative sources to get the power and internet, in case of temporary outage. Under normal circumstances, there is nothing to be worried about and the discussion may be irrelevant. In the other case of any extreme situations like War or Nuclear explosion, it may be difficult to survive a living, who would care about the internet/power at that time 

I also agree that Starlink is best support to get internet access specially different islands in the world. They are good because their technology is proven about client satisfaction. I have use their service in Maldives which was best for me to access online TV as internet speed was really fast into a deep sea island. This is how I am confident that bitcoin transaction will not stop even natural disaster like earth quake or cyclone. Sceye is now testing by launching test and it is possible they may bring something better than Starlink. Sceye technology would be more robust service during different natural disaster. what do you think?

I don't lnow where you live but instead of focusing on natural disaster or global pandemic it would be less self-centered to think about people living in area where there is no or very poor internet connction. Those places are most often found in poor countries where people need Bitcoin because they are unbanked. But they also exist in rich countries, especially wide ones, like Australia or Canada.

The response to the poor internet connection, with star was a break through and they are leading in the market but the problem is for how long will they be able to keep up with this whole thing, and Elon did is one of his kind and I don't think anyone have this same initiative that Elon is able to do. And I love when others are in competition at least it might even affect the price when star link, and their are people that will want to go for the best so the price does not matter to them.

And the price have skyrocketed and in my country the percentage of those using it will definitely drop because of how high the price as gone. If the new technology is cheaper then the demand will go high and people will start abandoning Elon because the new technology will be cheaper and efficient than star link so this is the difference, what matters is the price.

And with how dollar have now gone high is what will discourage people the most in my country but this is like a individual decision.