I think most of people who has been long enough in Bitcoin community have been already accepting that the Identity should remain a mystery, and they don't really wants to know who is he. But for general public who only know the Bitcoin from the hype and influencer would really like this kind of content, and IMO that is the target market of this docuseries, I would think this is just for entertainment purpose and would never put much my energy or to think this is a serious journalism.

Exactly, most of us here have been in the Bitcoin market for many years that we already know that Satoshi has disappeared and will not re-surface. And there are a lot of personalities that had claim that they are Satoshi, and we all know that all of them are fake. Of course, we would have our guesses as well, but since it can't be proven, everything here is just speculation. There are even some here that might believed that this so called revelation will bring some positive news to the market, but it's not, as we can see, we even have minor corrections already after HBO documentaries and revealing another interesting personality in the mix of who might be Satoshi.

They won’t even bother with that documentary, meh, I’m a Bitcoin pro myself and didn’t watch it either. I just checked out some comments here and looks like I was right not to waste my time. So we had Tom Todd, who’s next and when’s the next documentary coming out?

When this one will be forgotten, probably 

Of course, it is not serious journalism, are you kidding me? It's called "clickbait" which means to use a misguiding title, header, photo, or anything else that is being shown in an advertisement or an initial interaction with a viewer only to garner more clicks, views, visitors, etc. People who do such things have no actual interesting content for people to read or watch which provides them no organic reach which is why they start doing such things to get more views and visitors.

Someone who has read a little bit about Bitcoin and its history in recent times would know that Satoshi's identity cannot be revealed. He did what he needed to do and disappeared. If he wanted to become public or make himself known, he could do that in the early days of Bitcoin because, during that time, he wouldn't have many issues. But now? There is no chance.

Well that's true that his presence wouldn't have made Bitcoin centralized as he can't do anything to influence the network without the majority of miner being in support of it but there is just the thing about his presence somehow affect even maybe possibly the up and down movement of the market value of Bitcoin because one thing am sure of is that if there is one thing that the government is good at then it's actually frustrating the hell out of project owners especially a financial revolution project like Bitcoin which posses a big threat to their whole financial set up of centralized banking system.

I don't think Satoshi's reappearance would be a bad thing per se. I agree that it's better the way it currently is, but it would not be the end of decentralization, as Bitcoin is designed in a decentralized way. Also, it might draw a lot of attention to Bitcoin and excitement that Satoshi is back, which might actually be good for the price (depending on whom the person turns out to be). I don't think any government would have any claim to Satoshi's coins, similarly to them not having claims to anyone else's coins. What they can get very interested in, however, might be taxes, depending on Satoshi's tax residence.