We chose to invest in bitcoin because we believe there’s no reason for it to disappear. Even if the whole world discovers who Satoshi is, we won’t panic because we know it will keep progressing. Our confidence remains high for those who trust bitcoin, but it becomes difficult when doubt starts creeping into your mind. And that's a tough enemy, because as long as it’s there, it will always influence your decisions and actions. This is also why you won’t have peace of mind, since you’ll constantly be thinking about all the negative possibilities.

There is no gain if Satoshi's identity is revealed. In that case, Bitcoin would suffer mass price crashing, because the person behind the pseudonym Satoshi would have its history investigated and inevitably professional and social connections would be found, generating speculations on what the real interests behind Bitcoin creation are. As consequence, fear and insecurity would spread fastly among investors who would become doubtful about Bitcoin's future.

We wouldn't see Bitcoin like before anymore. For that reason, it's important Satoshi's identity remains a mistery. The focus must on the creation, which is Bitcoin, and not on its creator. Satoshi must know about it, and that is why he chose to not reveal himself to the public.

I believe each and everyone of us still use fiat and we all have at least one bank account, i am pro-BTC, but i don't think people who use fiat only without the inclusion of BTC are enemies of BTC, it is their choice to use BTC or not. In my honest opinion, if you are not directly attacking BTC like the way the government is doing, then you can't really be an enemy of the network.

I agree with you as usage of fiat cannot be seen as a form of attack on BTC as in most countries , BTC isn't considered a legal tender, in such situation, it's a really huge hindrance to its usage and so it will be counter productive trying to use Bitcoin in such locations but will be much better and wise to stick to the countries fiat while you still invest in Bitcoin and still make profits from which you can convert to fiat and still use.

No matter how we know that Satoshi identify is best unknown to the world we can't deny the fact that sometimes curiosity does sometimes make you ask that same question although thats just our curiosity playing on us. The reason we all in the crypto space or should Bitcoin users are okay with this unknown factor is because we all understand what's at stake although even if Satoshi identify is known now I believe the impact of change on would be less as Satoshi really can't do anything by himself that can literally affect the Bitcoin technology as it's decentralized nature makes it unique in this sense.

Cant really be able to avoid that people will really be finding out the real identity the one who created Bitcoin on which even the government is really that pursuing on trying out to do so.
There would really be those individuals who would be trying out to claim about its identity but the community wont really be a fool to believe on the things that arent that the truth.
It will really be that understandable that there will really be those questions but there are ones who dont just care about Satoshis identity but rather they are thankful on what Bitcoin
had provided in terms of utility at the same time it does give out that opportunity to make profits on just simply holding BItcoin. Enemies would really be usually be considered to those who do
hate up decentralization and anonymity.

I can somewhat sympathize with what you mean OP, I do think so that this people are the kind of people that wants to pry into something that's obviously not worth prying into but I wouldn't really call them an enemy though, I feel like it's a bit weird for us to be saying that because if we do that, how can we be any different from this people, we should at least have the class and dignity to be able to ignore them or pay them no heed and that they're nothing more than a nuisance to the identity of Satoshi. I don't get people that are obsessed with finding out who's the person behind that pseudonym but I don't like the idea of antagonizing them because in a way, they're still a part of the bitcoin community and it would be really weird that we are tearing each other when we are in the same circle of interests.

The real enemy of Bitcoin are those people who still see Bitcoin as a scam currency, because there is no way they can talk about the good of Bitcoin and they will not encourage people around them to know Bitcoin, and it will be difficult for such people to benefit from Bitcoin. Trying to know the identity of Satoshi is not a bad thing and it will not make you an enemy of Bitcoin when you believe in Bitcoin, because we all know that Satoshi will remain an anonymous for Bitcoin to fulfill her destiny in the world. Government and financial institutions can also be the enemy of Bitcoin, because they don't encourage people to invest in Bitcoin than to condemned Bitcoin for people not to show interest.

You are mistaking wealth for financial freedom. You can't have financial freedom without privacy, as I have already described. These two terms are used interchangeably, but this is incorrect, as freedom implies that you can do whatever you want with your money, and you can't do so without privacy.

I am a multimillionaire, and they don’t know how much I have (and never will), so there is a way.
They only know how much I’ve spent, minus a few things I purchased directly with crypto.

I don’t have to pay tax on crypto the government doesn’t know about; only when I decide to trade it do I have to pay tax on capital gains.


That’s not how it works, and you would face additional penalties for hiding your assets. You can find plenty of cases like this.

Bitcoin or any other transparent blockchain is a sure way to get ‘robbed’ by the government through taxes, your ex-wife, or criminals who found out how much you have.

I can pay capital gains from fiat, but I refuse to give them any portion of my crypto stash when they demand it. I wouldn’t feel comfortable if they, or anyone else, knew how much I have in crypto. If my country gets too harsh, I’ll take my money elsewhere.

Cryptocurrency is currently treated as property, and any property is subject to confiscation. If you don’t reveal access, they can simply blacklist your coins, and good luck dealing with that kind of taint. It’s much safer to use cryptocurrency that hides your balance - for many, many reasons.

Bitcoin's design is decentralized and open-source in itself, meaning it depends on no one man creator included, for that matter. What keeps Bitcoin running is its global network of miners, developers, and users, not Satoshi's identity. Besides, there have been numerous attempts at unmasking Satoshi-say, by Craig Wright claiming to be Satoshi, or recent rumors with Peter Todd. Every time, the community moved on, and Bitcoin was just as decentralized. Even if Satoshi's identity were made known today, the privacy and security features of the Bitcoin network would remain as robust as always. It is not about who started it, but it is the collective effort that continues to keep the system running today.