Adoption of Bitcoin as a legal tender by a poor country can not degenerate to any conflicts as far as I know, the privacy and freedom that Bitcoin guarantees to it's holders is the same benefits that the country will enjoy. A very good case study is El Salvador, so far we've not heard of any conflicts in that country because of Bitcoin. Conflicts are caused because of the interests of the leadership in a country, whether it's favorable to their citizens or not is another matter altogether. If a country whether rich or poor adopts Bitcoin, and if they have proactive leaders, then Bitcoin will become a true asset for their economy.

No, there's no source of conflict.

That's true, unfortunately most (probably all) of poor countries are have a corrupt government. You're hoping the government to reduce taxes, creating more jobs etc, but if the government is the one who corrupt, there's no way they will improve their country.

All they want is enrich themselves, actually they're more happy to see their citizen are struggling.

A that is still under the direct or indirect control of another strong nation cannot be financially independent. They will have to get approval from their colonial masters before they make any policy. This was the case in the Central African Republic when they adopted Bitcoin as a legal tender. This African country is under the control of France and they didn't even have a central bank. The adoption of Bitcoin caused a lot of conflict between CAR, France and other Francophone countries in Africa. The policy conflicted with the neo-colonial goals of France which made CAR repeal the law after a few months.

However, El Salvador was able to withstand and overcome the pressures from the international Organisation to limit its exposure to Bitcoin. Therefore regardless of the colonial ties, a strong-willed leader like Bukele can still make a difference.       

The narrative of being under control and domination from colonial powers is just an excuse to justify the current chaos these countries face in present time. Instead of changing their conduct, people from these countries blame foreigners for their own mistakes and failures.

Bitcoin can't help this way, because the problem isn't solely financial, but a problem of mindset. If the mindset doesn't change, these countries will remain poor.

It's necessary to have discipline, focus and the desire to evolve. If you remove your thoughts from the victimization and directs it to personal development, you will start seeing considerable improvements in your life.

Then, and only then, Bitcoin can become an useful tool in this process.

Inasmuch as Bitcoin can stand to resolve lingering conflict issues in the said country,especially when it involves economic growth and financial stability,it's not a big deal or a necessity for any country to adopt Bitcoin.Its a decision for once but if the legalities and the country's interest doesn't correspond then;so be it.The major tool can be unfavorable all together.
Bitcoin will not solve socio-political adversities because there'll be so much conflicts while implementing Bitcoin as means of mediation.

the main area where  countries that were previously colonized  still looks like they are still under the control of their colonial masters is in area relating to certain economic policies that require dealing with those said nation. The underdevelopment and lack of technological systems makes it impossible to depend on themselves for all her need which is basically how the structure of the global economy works. If there's a need to adopt Bitcoin, it doesn't in any way have a dealing with who is whose colonial masters.

Apart from instances where the countries intention is to use Bitcoin as her reserve outside the USDT, if it's just on the aspect of allowing citizens to invest, and operate cryptocurrency related transactions seamlessly without government regulations, there won't be a need for the government to play a pivotal role in such decisions at all.

Poor countries even need Bitcoin more than the developed ones since thier currency has lost it value, inflation has risen too high and the only edge against it will be the use of Bitcoin as a store of value. Conflict is almost like a constant as far as you're talking of a region that's engulfed with poverty so with or without Bitcoin adoption, it wouldn't change a thing.

Yep especially with the country that aren't accept technology, they don't even know how to use internet and the devices.

It's need a good understanding in technology, someone who already know how to use devices and internet sometime still don't know anything with Bitcoin and they're prone to be scammed.

It will be not effective to adopt Bitcoin in poor countries.

The risk of conflict and instability will always be present, same with what El Salvador has faced during the proposal for bitcoin as a legal currency. However, with proper understanding and guidance from a good leader, everything will be put into order, but it will definitely takes some time.

One thing that will surely arise as a potential conflict is the regulatory challenges. No matter how the government may try to regulate bitcoin, but seeing other users taking it for illicit activities, that would definitely create a chaos between the government and the bitcoin users. This could be manageable probably but is quite inevitable becoming it a strong issue.

Allowing their citizens to use bitcoin in a controlled manner is not freedom and that is quite literally what most people do not want. Bitcoin enthusiasts are aiming for freedom and decentralization and giving at least a small part of their freedom to the government is not complete freedom at all. additionally the government will not really be able to give off all control but even if they act like they are only there to supervise, once they see something that do not go their way they will surely butt in and take away what their citizens have under the pretense of law and order. So it does not work either way.