Owning Bitcoin does not mean owning a lot; to sign a message, ownership is unnecessary. Anyone can sign, and the OP statistics look like the most common vote manipulation to me. In the same way, you can conclude the leadership in the elections if you compare the number of views of Trump's interview and his number of likes compared to Kamala.
Now people manipulate any advantage of something.
One general facts about these men, they've influence and we totally understand the fleeting directives of the system. Manipulation is real and frustrating when you're the victim. So it's advisable to always be on the winning side and avoid troubles. Bitcoin is far classify to be a trend in the space, it's consider to be very important for the space, owning up to the desirable measures and following up every parting criteria. Everyone has a choice, there's basic factors wrapping up together to constitute good meaning. Harris holds 454.07 BTC and that puts him to be huge investor for the space, a very considerate one at that.
