That's what I also expressed when Trump got elected but a few people were quick to get upset with my statement. I highly doubt that Trump's management is going to have any significant impact on Bitcoin, I don't believe he's going to change any laws regarding cryptocurrencies. This positive movement occurred because Bitcoin enthusiasts rallied for Trump after a few statements he made supporting Bitcoin and recognizing it properely (he had previously said it's made out of thin air in 2019). This momentum is what pushed the price even further, I doubt that Trump is actually going to help Bitcoin in practice.

It's not wrong if you care about your privacy and you can have it with controlling your inputs, outputs well. If you want more, you can use Coinjoin for your transactions and mixers are farther than Coinjoin.

I agree that individually it's nothing wrong when you use Coinjoin or Mixers, but you can have problems with centralized exchanges if you send your bitcoin there after a transaction with mixer or Coinjoin. You might have very small risk of issues with government but with centralized exchanges, risk is not small. Especially in recent months, many big centralized exchanges turned to be favorite targets of DOJ and expensive law fees.

Trump is an economist and an entrepreneur, let's just give it a time to assume office and structures how he can manage the compatibility on how he can actualize those p promises. Probably those encouraging false alarms on his policies could be wrong at end.

I never said banning mixers is going to kill BTC, surely BTC will survive without privacy solutions. However, since there is no privacy in BTC's protocol level, privacy solutions like mixers become imperative for people who want anonymity, that is what i am saying, and so banning mixers affects people who to use BTC anonymously, not that it affects the network in itself.