Where did you get this crab mentality about bitcoin development and bitcoin developers from?

You got it Al wrong and just to set the record straight, butcoiyis doing pretty well and everything about bitcoin is being run according to the core satoshi mindset towards bitcoin development and it involvements.

Satoshi said, allow bitcoin to develop naturally and without interference.

And from all you pointed out, there are no sound technicalities about how Bitcoin can advance above what ut is tight now.

I, too, am curious as to exactly what parts of Bitcoin development are unethical.

Hey Wiwo,

Not sure what you are referring to with ‘crab mentality’ about Bitcoin development and developers.

I think there is room for a lot of improvement for Bitcoin and its development from a governance point of view. And I think there is a lot of room for improvement for Bitcoin from a usecase point of view.

When the narrative of Bitcoin shifted in 2014 from the usecase of p2p cash into ‘digital gold’ the dynamic of what Bitcoin can possibly mean for the world shifted.

Satoshi named Bitcoin a Peer-To-Peer Electronic System and not ‘digital gold’ with a careful reason. When mankind believes and treats Bitcoin as a vehicle of investment it creates the possibility for humans to promote inequality.

A Peer-To-Peer Electronic System instead creates the opportunity for humans to use Bitcoin as a medium of exchange or economic opportunity.

Power dynamics are less involved with the latter goal.

The paradigm shift that took place this year in Bitcoin’s adoption from a global governmental and tradefi markets point of view showcases the importance of Satoshi’a message embedded in the genesis block:

“The Times 03/Jan/2009 Chancellor on brink of second bailout for banks.”

A message referring to the headline of the London newspaper, The Times, on the noted date.
The U.K. government was bailing out the banks for the second time during that period.

Satoshi’s message should remind us all how important it is to govern Bitcoin in such a way that Bitcoin’s usecase is separated from any power dynamics within government and state. A significant change is happening as we speak.

Thusfar my response for usecase and trajectory of Bitcoin.

My second response is regarding the governance point of view:

It is widely known that various contributors and maintainers of Bitcoin core have their personal world views from a religious, spiritual and ethical standpoint. If the OG and the new contributors and mainters of Bitcoin truly want Bitcoin to become adopted on a continuous global scale it is important that those involved with its governance are aligned to make it work for all of humankind.

It takes hard work to get people aligned for such a manifestation. A team of humanbeings working together for the all of the humanrace is a team healed of all the indoctrinations of hate.

A team of peace.

Let me know if you have any questions?

I think you gonna need help right now because at this point all that you mentioned above is far from being technical help which is the only help that is regarded here in the Bitcoin ecosystem, I see you mentioned spiritual in your writing, really are you being sarcastic right now, what have spiritual gat to do with bitcoin right here.

Just like I advised you above, you need to unlearn all the crabs you filled your head with and make attempts to get the right information and knowledge about Bitcoin and its technicalities.

Technically, the current mechanism for changing bitcoin hinges on what Core developers will merge.. unintentionally but a known truth among developers that worked or work on Bitcoin core.

For the technical proposals that are currently on the table like scaling UTXO ownership and new self custody capabilities I actually don’t have much to comment.

Yeah, I guess hard to comprehend for you that humans actually also use their religious or spiritual indoctrinations within development. And if it is not religious or spiritual there should be a set of norms and values to go into it for any developer.

Yet avoiding unethical practices helps out a lot in the longterm.

I've followed some discussion among Bitcoin developer and contributor, but i never see anyone bring religion or spiritual doctrines. At most, i only remember certain pool put religious quote on block header/coinbase TX which happened long time ago where it's already resolved.

research core, especially their hierarchy, their allocation of github privileges, their funding and whom also controls moderation of all technical discussion platforms.. you will find out its not hundreds-thousands of random users

Agreed.

At the same time,

Luke and other core devs are definitely not obligated to answer any questions regarding their (religious) world view or behavioural patterns they ‘could’ struggle with right.

It is a very personal thing for most people.

But core contributors and maintainers speaking about it openly would help the community hugely to understand the ethical vision and thought processes of those involved with Bitcoin’s governance and development upgrades.