Switzerland's Premier Bitcoin Treasury Company FUTURE Raises CHF 28 Million


IMAGE


Switzerland's premier Bitcoin Treasury Company "FUTURE" has successfully raised  28 million Swiss franc to launch it's Bitcoin Treasury Holding . Future Bitcoin Holdings company is lead by a combined teams of expertise in Bitcoin with a Vision to build Europe premier Bitcoin company.

I found this paper quite interesting to read because the author briefly reviews how Bitcoin, alongside gold, will be used as a strategic reserve by 2030. He also covers several important topics such as its characteristics, scarcity, advantages, and performance over time, as well as whether it is suitable as a strategic reserve. Their point at the end is also interesting, as they say that Bitcoin's volatility will decrease over time, and people's skepticism and suspicion of Bitcoin will decrease, eventually leading to full acceptance, much like gold did in the past.

Their analysis is quite good and I kind of agree with what they said, because the current trend is that Bitcoin is heading there, where there will be more banks and institutions that will start to be interested in adopting it to diversify their investments.

The only aspect where Bitcoin is inferior to gold is precisely its history.
Gold has been around for 4,000 years and has worked perfectly.
Bitcoin has been around for 16 years and has gone from 0% to 10% of the gold market capitalisation.
Hopefully it will take only a few decades to get to 100%, as information and markets are way more efficient than in the past centuries.

Edit: corrected a typo

If we compare gold and Bitcoin, then I must say that Bitcoin has increased hundreds of times more than gold in just 16 years.

10 years Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR)

Bitcoin: Bitcoin has topped the list in terms of compound annual growth rate over the past 10 years, growing by 85%.
NVIDIA: If there is one that has grown the most after Bitcoin, then Nvidia has grown by 80% at an annual rate over the last 10 years.
Gold: Gold has a compound annual growth rate of only 12% over the past 10 years, meaning if you want to differentiate between Bitcoin and Gold, it is clear to see just by looking at the 10-year history.

Of course the CAGR of Bitcoin has been so much higher than the one of gold: the issue is other usual problem of Bitcoin value proposition comprehension. As we progress trough time, Bitcoin comprehension will drive market capitalisation higher, volatility lower, and liquidity higher.

but according to Bloomberg, Kazakhstan's national cryptocurrency reserve fund will be using assets seized and repatriated from abroad. also will be used proceeds from state-backed mining operations. and the most importand fund’s investments would include exchange traded funds and the shares of companies involved with digital currencies.

https://news.bloomberglaw.com/crypto/kazakh-crypto-asset-fund-targets-1-billion-with-seized-wallets

I doubt Kazakhstan will sell gold to buy BTC. as we see they don't plan to spend money on buying real BTC and their cryptocurrency reserve fund resembles what USA want to do in the future also using seized assets.

Putting shitcoins into a strategic reserve (that has been created by a country) is surely questionable in terms of justifying doing such a thing, unless the percentages of such shitcoins were to be relatively low.. such as less than 10% the size of the bitcoin for all of the shitcoins put together.. and which ones? and how are they custodied?).  

I understand certain shitcoins and stable coins have been gaining some popularity recently.. so I would imagine that some of the stable coins may well be considered as a potentially alternate way of getting exposure to the dollar, perhaps?


And yeah the emphasis on seizing bitcoin and/or crypto is also a problematic direction for any government to be emphasizing that method of accumulating their stash. It provides bad motives if they are seizing and even potentially providing inadequate due process procedures so that people can make claims to have their coins returned in the event that their might be valid claims, even in seizure cases their should not be a presumption of guilty... so governments should have to establish that the coins were justly confiscated if that were to end up being the way that they get the coins.

Guess they avoid to buy due to political and other regulatory issue, that's why they choose to have indirect exposure rather than buying Bitcoin directly. I think the current administration think that they are safe from any political pressure if they will just used those coins came repatriated, seize and also their state back Bitcoin mining operation.

I also have doubts that they will make it happen like they convert their gold to BTC. Maybe they are closely monitoring on the next possible action done by US. If it happens that they would start to accumulate from their national funds, maybe they might consider also to follow what the giants did.

There's a difference between analysis and speculation. If it's speculation, then the article isn't based on facts, but rather merely the author's personal opinion or conjecture without any solid data. Analysis, on the other hand, is based on facts, historical data, and sound logic... and in the article, the author presents information based on data and analysis that aligns with what happened, and then draws reasonable conclusions that are relevant to current and future conditions.


Volatility is part of Bitcoin... but as time goes on and Bitcoin gains more adoption, Bitcoin's volatility will slowly begin to decrease and Bitcoin will become more stable.



Bitcoin's actual performance can't be predicted with complete accuracy, but by considering information from previous periods, we can get a sense of Bitcoin's future performance. This approach is widely used by analysts to assess the performance of an asset, whether Bitcoin or other assets. Analysts typically use this data to draw conclusions about the future outlook for that asset. While the results aren't guaranteed, they can be a useful source of information.

I think that will be a good initiative more especially as regards to the decrease in volatility, because the length at which the volatile is occurring is way too much for people to bear if not for determination and commitment and also the good reputation that it has kept the panick would have been much,  but the good reputation that it kept is what keeps guys motivated and also stick to the ongoing buying of Bitcoin irrespective of the market situation.

Surely, these issue regarding volatility is holding bank and institutions from not using Bitcoin as reserve, I think if all of this it's being executed I won't be surprised to see Bitcoin going the next level because the adoption is going to be massive.