Comparing Bitcoin with gold, I would say that gold is a physical asset that has its own value and people use it. On the other hand, Bitcoin is a digital and virtual asset that has no physical existence and is only traded on a digital platform. Gold is a very ancient metal. But Bitcoin has only been around for 15 years. However, both are used for almost the same purpose. That is to "store value". They are used to maintain value in the long term, especially against inflation.

EarnOnVictor I think the reason you see the term "Digital Gold" being used for bitcoin as inappropriate is because you don't get the concept. Well we know bitcoin has progressed far more than gold and many other precious metals over the last decade however the term "Digital Gold" is not a comparison between bitcoin and gold rather it's more like an expression of value.

Gold for millennials has been a precious asset with high demand and the concept of something that is priced decently and highly valued is the reason for the the term "Digital Gold" .Bitcoin being referred to as digital GOLD is more of a metaphorical expression specifically an analogy that highlights their similarities in terms of value storage, scarcity, and hedge against inflation or economic uncertainty.

Manually or Physically?
And I also didn't understand that what you mean by "Gold was once considered as property and it has become an asset". As far as I know gold was exchanged for trading thousands of years ago, meaning that gold was used as currency just like we use fiat currency today. However, today, although most people actually buy it as jewelry, the majority of the world's gold determines the reserve value of various countries.
And about the Bitcoin yes we can say it is the Digital gold. Because if  we thought that then we will find gold is limited in this world and that's why it's become one of the precious asset. Same for the Bitcoin for the billions of people there is only 21 million Max supply on Bitcoin. And that is why the demand for Bitcoin will increase day by day and its price will increase, so we can call it virtual gold or digital gold.

In the Satoshi Whitepaper, some of the things Bitcoin is been called today isn't indicated there but the frequent used of the words and phrase and influencers made the name popular and so they embrace. Been digital currency, it's first of his kind to ever move this way. Even in the Whitepaper, it was indicated to be electronic cash peer to peer that requires your signature but this signature was indicated to be a digital one, so digital gold is justified form the Whitepaper.

My own preference is as long as Bitcoin is serving its purpose, I don't have any problem with it and if it becomes embrace by the governments, that's a bonus and if they don't, it doesn't stop Bitcoin from achieving its purpose. It's the institutional people that are lobbying their way so they can benefits from their investment, they never really care about the core value of Bitcoin, only the few around support Bitcoin even when it doesn't have much of a value.

I mean yeah, there's no problem with that if some keeps on insisting it with their beliefs that Bitcoin is also a digital gold.

It's not even an argument to say but if someone wants to prolong the discussion about it, let's all settle with that. We cannot hold people's opinion about Bitcoin whether as a digital silver, digital piece that can be an asset for a long time or simply a digital gold.

With that means, this is just one of the many digital gold out there: [BOUNTY] GOLD Stablecoin

Gold has been one of the most valuable assets for centuries now, so it's not entirely wrong when people are adding gold to the name of bitcoin when describing it because it's the only asset whose value and demand are close to that of gold.

People find words that can easily explain and give the type of meaning they want to things and attach it; it's easier that way for them, which is why it will be very difficult to change that from those who already know and consider bitcoin as digital gold.

I think the reason people view bitcoin as a digital gold is because gold is one of the few assets ( if not the only asset) that has stood the test of time without being subjected to depreciation, inflation, deflation and devaluation. It is a very good store of value which is not directly under the control of the government. With this qualities and others not stated here, there is no other better asset to compare bitcoin to. Even though bitcoin is subjected to volatility, bitcoin has proven to be a better alternative for those who are only stuck with gold.

However, inspite of the similarities bitcoin and gold may share, bitcoin has today outgrown gold which first came into existence. The early investors who first likened bitcoin to gold were not wrong in their comparisons because they saw future potentials in bitcoin and tagged it a digital gold. Present day investors can decide to see bitcoin as bitcoin and gold as gold if they feel these two are no more in thesame category.

No, dude. I can't understand because manually means a things which is not automated that need to hand of human and it not only the physical things that has only manual system, Because I also see the presence of manual on digital or in virtual things.

Btw, can you explain me what is property and what is the asset? 

Affirmative!

There is digital Gold and it has existed shortly after the internet's payment systems gained recognition. I've used many of them and they are being used just as Bitcoin, but the only difference is that people do not know of this not to mention adopting it since developers and businesses do not look toward that angle due to Fiat's dominance. Bitcoin broke the jinx, contended with fiat and won, which makes it popular.

Till today, some of my brokers let you deposit Gold as your currency through internal conversion and converts it back to fiat when you want to withdraw. So this is not about the physical Gold.

I honestly couldn't pick what you are trying to explain here, they just don't correlate. No one is disputing Bitcoin's digital form, we all know that, but the attribution of anything "Gold" to it is my contention. It should have its valuable terms without drawing it from any asset.

As far as I remember, the first person to compare Bitcoin to gold was the founder of the first cryptocurrency, Satoshi Nakamoto.

At the same time, he pointed out the properties of Bitcoin that give it advantages over gold. Unlike gold, Bitcoin is an intangible asset. This allows you to move capital (using Bitcoin) very quickly and over long distances. A gold bar is easy to counterfeit, and an experienced expert is needed to determine its authenticity. The Bitcoin blockchain is designed in such a way that it is not difficult to establish the authenticity of Bitcoin.

At the same time, Bitcoin continues to be called digital gold. This is not surprising. When some new entity appears in the world that is difficult for people to understand, they begin to compare it with something else that they know well.

This is why, in my opinion, Bitcoin is compared to gold.

Very soon, Bitcoin's capitalization will be equal to gold's capitalization....

And then gold will fade into the background, and people will stop comparing Bitcoin to gold, calling the first cryptocurrency digital gold. Bitcoin is Bitcoin, Bitcoin is real money.