I knew that Jamie Dimon made many fud attacks against Bitcoin in many years and he turned his bank JP Morgan to a pro-Bitcoin bank. Honestly I really don't know that Jamie Dimon bought bitcoin for himself or for JP Morgan bank, then sold it for huge profit.

Products for cryptocurrency users at JP Morgan bank.
https://bitwiseinvestments.com/crypto-market-insights/crypto-market-review-q4-2023

Fud against Bitcoin is a lot and you don't need to waste your time to read FUD.

There is https://endthefud.org/ website which collects many insightful resources to end fud against Bitcoin. Traditional main stream media don't like that site because it reveals in accuracy for their fud.

Remember what they said about the Internet in the late 90's? They called it soon to be extinct as well just like Bitcoin.

Since Bloomberg requires paid subscription, I'll share exactly the same article but posted on a different website: https://www.malaymail.com/news/opinion/2014/01/01/bitcoin-is-a-high-tech-dinosaur-soon-to-be-extinct-stephen-mihm/590775
I think that it will be good if OP edits the post with this link.

And that's terrible. People, who don't understand subject A, speak about subject A. They shouldn't talk about subject A if they don't understand it but it's far worse when economic gurus talk about this subject. I really wish to see these people affected by their wrong predictions but sadly, it doesn't happen.

Yes, that's true. I think that it's normal to see pessimistic predictions when something is brand new but overall, I believe that when you call yourself an expert, you should be 100 times more careful with every word you say about the subject you are expert in.

---

11 years ago I didn't know what Bitcoin was and I regret that I was playing video games instead of being interested in programming and cryptocurrencies but a few years ago I understood that it's an innovation, it's the future and now I'm in a right place.

Honestly, if you ask me such headlines are good for the history books!

People that got spooked by the headline choose to stay away from bitcoin investments and at the moment if you ask them if they regret missing this opportunity,  they sure will tell you this was a lottery ticket of the century and wish the opportunity presented itself again.

Otherwise I wonder what's their stance on Bitcoin.

Yeah, I remember MSNBC and one other gold bug media outlet years back creating a lot of FUD on Bitcoin and probably they are still up to this day. But for sure they might have regretted their decision to go anti-Bitcoin in those early years and should be buying a few instead of attacking it.

Now we are in the era that there's no denying Bitcoin, and even if they continue to offensive attack on Bitcoin, there are no stopping that it will grow in the next 11 years and adoption is just around the corner for us. This legacy thinkers will be just another relics if they don't want to embrace BTC.

Mainstream media often show bias due to their interests in traditional assets, but this shouldn't stop the Bitcoin community from continuing to educate and strengthen the ecosystem. Criticism can actually be an opportunity to prove Bitcoin's real value.

I think thats fair. I was pointing out what the regular folks are concerned about. These are generally the sentiments you’re going to hear from the general population rather than a forum with a specific group of people. Hence, the kinds of articles and opinions from columnists. The topic that we’re discussing would probably be better suited for another more focused thread. Cheers!

I didn't really believe what they wrote at that time. In fact, it seems that it is just an opinion that aims to bring Bitcoin users to sell or even not enter the crypto world. In fact, I suspect that anyone would dare to pay to publish a negative article about Bitcoin. Moreover, Bloomberg is quite a well-known media. Maybe not only Bloomberg, many say Bitcoin will go to zero. But as long as he has been around until now, Bitcoin has shattered all those predictions. Maybe nowadays we should respect all opinions, but I don't like it when Bitcoin is said to be a problem. 

They bought traffics from changing their tones and narratives about Bitcoin when Trump elected and they knew about his stance on Bitcoin. They changed recent months but they can change in future if a next President in the USA. has different approach of regulation on Bitcoin and this market. Fortunately and impressively, Bitcoin does not need main stream media to survive and grow up. They can do whatever they want, positively or negatively about Bitcoin, but Bitcoin will continue its growth with time.

Their contributions to Bitcoin obituaries are meaningless to kill Bitcoin.
https://99bitcoins.com/bitcoin-obituaries/