This is an interesting experiment but I believe the real risk isn't the AI itself but potential human oversight or security flaws in data handling. If a wallet gets drained, it could mean the AI systems store or transmit data in ways we don't fully understand. Still, without knowing Matteo's full setup, I'd take the results with caution. Regardless, seed phrases should never be uploaded anywhere, better safe than sorry.

Yep.
We won't know what agenda they would be pushing, only assumptions and speculations.
But for certain, they are in for the grants doing their work

I don't doubt this is possible if you create an AI agent who has deep access to a Large Language Model. However, the LLM itself would not be able imo because this is not what it was designed for. It is designed to react to human queries.

What would be needed is some kind of "fake consciousness". This looks like some ultra-advanced sci-fi but would be simply a routine regularly executing certain kinds of queries. It has to be trained to query the LLM to reach certain goals.

I think the current state of technology doesn't allow such an auto-query process covering most aspects of human life or even the field of a professional worker, as this would be very close to an "AGI" already. But a "specialist fake consciousness", e.g. a program all the time trying to create and improve ways to earn cryptocurrencies, would be probably possible.

One could for example start first with some kind of trading bot and then improve it giving it more information/context about ways how crypto can be earned. The next step would be to let him discover new ways to earn, and finally, auto-improve this "game" until it becomes good enough to solve Pellegrini's "puzzle".

It seems at first difficult to set apart such an AI from a traditionally programmed program (humans simply tell them how to search for the data). However, as LLMs are very large and complex, it can be difficult to find such an algorithm traditionally, so some form of AI training would probably be needed for this kind of program/agent.

Yeah that fits and is right and it makes sense if we think about it. if there is only personal as his personal thesis. AI app just good at generating and not set for bad things in my opinion..

The last time I checked AI's don't store people's questions or inquiries in a way that can be recalled identified, after every active session the Al clears itself so I doubt there will be possibility of stealing any of the coin from the different wallets used for this experiment. AI only uses the data generated from our inquiry to retrain it's model.

With this said if the AI doesn't store questions or inquiries then there will be no information in the database for the db engineers overseeing the AI to steal from.

The experiment is actually an empty one and we saw that the coin in DeepSeek hasn't been spent it's still intact in the UXTO. Which can a hypothetical conclusion that AI won't steal our coin neither can the db engineers but it's not worth risking our seed phrase as well

I don't think the AI will tamper with his assets using the phrase. However, I have always been conscious of the fact that these bots are managed by someone. Information is also gathered , and saved by the bots and from the bots, remember? Those maintaining the AI might access information, if they want to...am just thinking. So it's not entirely safe, I think.

Even though we don't know if the experimenter will give us accurate findings and not alter his findings. I strongly will stick to what I think is safe for me.

Well, if it's there's a faulty in the AI system then many people will be able to access it but if isn't then it's exactly what you said however, if what I said in my previous post means that people will be able to steal the bitcoin. It's still better not to depend on AI or something the same although if the one who did the experiment willing to take the risk and can afford to lose the funds used for the experiment then I'd love to know the result of it.

I do not think that any coins will go missing. But I do think that giving AI your seed is a novel way of getting your wallet hacked

It will go missing if somehow the image is also being trained on the upcoming LLM model, if not, then nobody gonna get it, also new LLM already give a safety measure for something confidential like this, I bet his money won't go missing but there's always a chance that something happen knowing that the data could very well be seen by the AI developers I guess.

LLM doesn't store your data in their model, the company does, and they only retrieve your conversation from their database, but there might be some LLM or agentic AI that is created for stealing people's money by executing some code maybe it's possible.
at least that's what I know.

Whoever you are, please do not quote me when you decide to shitpost. If you have something constructive to post, then feel free to quote me and expect me to answer. Otherwise you are going to waste your time and bring some attention to your account and your alternative accounts. I am not the one who will do something bad, but your chance of joining the campaign will become slim if you continue to shitpost. These random word salad do not deserve to be rewarded.