Kevin wrote his own story, so knowing the ending is no disrespect. Maybe we can even learn something from it, can't we?
I think of this story like, if you made mistake, shared your story, your privacy gone, and on Internet, your story will be there forever. You can not erase your story from Internet, like in the Bitcoin forum too.
Satoshi Nakamoto, the founder of Bitcoin, cared about privacy and anonymity at beginning and we can not find the founder identity. Kevin was known, his story was known publicly, and now if he want privacy, he won't get it.
Stories like buying dips in the past, don't mean they are in a fortune now. Early Bitcoin adaopters and buyers could make mistake and they never want to talk about their past mistakes again buy selling bitcoin too early in the past. A most famous story about
mistake of selling bitcoin too cheap is laszlo with bitcoin for pizza.
Pizza for bitcoins?
First of all, you learn from other people's mistakes, and your own too. Here the legal point of view is interesting: did Kevin get to keep the btc he bought at the time of the crash, or is that considered theft?
Besides, you're the one who considers the pizza purchase a mistake, but that's not Laszlo's point of view.
He explained in several interviews that at the time, Bitcoin did not yet have real market value, and
his goal was to demonstrate that it could be used for real purchases. He was primarily a developer and enthusiast, not an investor.
He also mentioned that he does not regret this transaction because it played a key role in Bitcoins adoption as a means of exchange. Without initiatives like his, he believes Bitcoin would have taken longer to be seen as a legitimate currency.
Laszlo does not consider it as a mistake but rather
an important contribution to Bitcoins history.
(and besides, if no one ever bought in btc, it would no longer be a currency)