1. Quick note on the delay 
I’ve been busy and honestly came to terms with the loss, so I don’t refresh the thread every day. Catching up now.

2. “Zero show-downs = chip-dump”? – No. 
The first 43 hands were 3-handed at 200/400. Small-pot poker often ends pre-flop or on the flop. Tiny pots, no shove/fold transfers. Nothing unusual.

3. @LastcallS – still no proof you were even at that table. 
Twice I asked for a 1-minute screen-recording: log in, open any hand, show you’re BillySwords or Eazy1. Twice you ignored it. 
No HH from you, no screenshot of the alleged 112 800-chip refund. Your posts look identical to the SWC style—lots of claims, zero data.

4. Access for my account 
@memehunter offered to audit raw HH. I’m fine with that—but my SWC account is LOCKED, so I can’t pull fresh exports. The chat history I posted is real; SWC and LastcallS can verify or upload history it from their side.
Confirmation about locked account : https://i.ibb.co/sdm8M6FH/2025-06-04-11h12-22.png

5. Nutildah - “No clashes between the three accounts”? – Wrong. 
In the public HH there are lots of show-downs between gd1990, caroline93 and MichaelDE, including all-ins. So much for “soft-play”.
Example : https://i.ibb.co/7xFMbg71/2025-02-05-11h28-47.png

6. Fold pre-flop with KK 
One hand shows me timing out/folding KK. I was juggling ERC-20/degen day-trades and real life (alerts, child, toilet break). Check the rest of the log—I’m usually stealing SB/BB, not folding KK from this position when other players pass.

7. It’s SWC accusing me of multi-accounting—yet you’ve shown zero evidence. 
- If those 3 accounts were really funded by the same BTC wallet, publish the transaction hashes. The blockchain is public; nothing disappears.
- Add IP logs, operating systems, browser fingerprints—that’s standard in any serious investigation.
- I’ve already published the full 10-hour hand history, which you refused to share.
- I also posted other materials, while you censor posts, ban people on Telegram/Twitter for asking questions, delete messages in your self-moderated Bitcointalk thread, and freeze winning accounts without explanation. How is the community supposed to trust you?

Why should I have to prove my innocence? If you have no hard proof, the payout belongs to its rightful owner.
The rule is simple: when a company withholds a player’s funds, the burden of proof is on the company to show a violation.

8. SWC just deleted another post of mine 
I asked (again) for hashes + fingerprints in their self-moderated thread—deleted within hours. They only show up here to post fluff, never data.

Flag still open: 
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=trust;flag=3394

I'm busy this week and aside I didn't want to say anything else in this thread but what I can't do is watch someone act smart saying bullshit and stay quiet.


Lol.


Let's see smartass, someone who limps AA, what do you want him to do when OP raises?


And what do you want MichaelDE to do on a raibow flop and with double gutshot. Raise to isolate his hand against better hands?


Sure bet/raise/reraise to insulate against completed straight, sets and top doubles.


In your mind. MichaelDE is slow playing is monster hand from the preflop and achieves his objective. Your garbage analysis proves nothing.

And I don't even know why I'm wasting my time commenting on this. If a casino steals money from your account they have to provide proof of what you have done wrong, not the other way around. I think the OP was wrong to provide the hands in good faith, as this has turned into a trial of him rather than the casino, which has proven nothing.

Can I ask the source? I know this forum is not a fan of GPT, but I am a premium subscriber for $200 a month.
I checked it now by doing ‘deep research’ in o1_pro model .
Model analyzed all hands for about 10minutes with a script in python.
I got this result :

Went to River Went to Showdown
gd1990 vs caroline93     30   17
gd1990 vs MichaelDE    39   23
MichaelDE vs caroline93   18   11

Original output in a readable format :
https://i.ibb.co/mrnPWYYD/2025-06-05-11h29-15.png

GPT also created a file for me where only the hands are.
https://paste.ee/p/U4ZTnKlG



@Kalaea - This hand to you may be collusion, and to me and others it may not look like collusion at all.

Player with Aces (MichaelDE): He used a passive trap strategy (slow play).
He deliberately showed weakness (limp, calle) to provoke aggression, not wanting to scare out of the hand.

His last check was a combination of stubbornness and logic. He recognized that his opponent's aggression on a threatening table was a likely bluff after a bad hand. At the same time, with such a large pot on the table (pot-committed) and still a very strong hand (AA), folding from his perspective was simply too difficult and costly a decision already. He decided to “catch the bluff” instead of cheating.

So you and popek1990 are the same person? Explains a lot. Glad you got caught.