These are great hypotheses, but I think we don't have to choose one or two or three from them. I believe it must be a combination of all of these. Ross, for example, must have his ideological basis, but it doesn't mean he wasn't driven by power and money and control at the same time. To be able to put into action one's ideological beliefs while making money, earning power, gaining control, and so on at the same time must be intoxicating.
So I asked myself the question of extreme wealth:
- if it's legally obtained money, you may be afraid that people will kidnap someone in your family, you may doubt the sincerity of certain relatives (we've seen some sordid stories in the family of a French footballer whose name I've forgotten), you may want to surround yourself with bodyguards.
- with illegally earned money, you may be afraid of going to prison, of being killed or tortured by a rival, you may have to find a way to launder the funds, you may also constantly doubt those around you, and become paranoid.
It doesn't sound so cool to be very rich when you consider all these aspects, does it?
That's if we don't consider the other side of the coin. To be very rich means power. You can even include in your payroll generals and presidents and judges. Now, that's something that excites.