The point was in relation to the subject of this thread, "Bitcoin and Immortality" since I thought it interesting for the OP since it involved both topics and someone well known within the bitcoin community.

However, since you made misleading and misinformed comments about how cryonics could work, I'd suggest you read about it, that will increase your understanding.  You have no idea how difficult I think reviving someone would be, so that's way off the mark.

In addition to Hal, Ralph Merkle (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ralph_Merkle) signed up - anyone involved with bitcoin should know his name-, Marvin Minsky likely signed up (https://www.alcor.org/2016/01/official-alcor-statement-concerning-marvin-minsky/ ) - ditto if involved in CS ever-, Ray Kurzweil (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ray_Kurzweil), Peter Thiel (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Peter_Thiel ) among many others, but they are all well educated and informed on the subject.  

Whether the chances it works are 95% as Arthur C Clarke thought ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arthur_C._Clarke) or 10% or 0.1%, they all are infinitely greater than zero.  Of course it is each person's individual choice.  People were antibiotic and CPR skeptics at one point too but many people value the gift of life even if cut short like with Hal among many others.

This link may also be of help for anyone who wants to inform themselves on the topic:
https://waitbutwhy.com/2016/03/cryonics.html

😀

Thus a much more relevant meaning is not that it cannot be inherited but rather that there is no opportunity for the deceased to transfer bitcoin to their heirs.
But there is something that may be stored such as a private key so that the heirs can regain access to the bitcoin storage by obtaining it.
When you are seen in bitcoin, the main thing to think about is how to secure the asset and the second is how to distribute it to our loved ones after we die.

There are still solutions that can be done as long as the bitcoin owner himself prepares smart steps before he dies.
So that the heirs get access when the private key is given after going through the storage process.

The safest way of storing your bitcoin is offline and from research and experiences of others its strictly advised not to store your private keys online, entrusting your private key to a robot who run all their data online is kind of insane, because you have posing serious risk to your bitcoin wallet except you aim at losing your bitcoins. Besides hackers are always active trying to crash one down a puzzle and if they eventually get their hands on your private keyz, the rest would be a regretful story to tell. If you must store your seed phrase, private keys in a computer it must be an air-gapped device with no internet connection. Every other storage means that is not offline is absolutely risky and not advised.

First of all I wasn't referring to you, but to OP, who said that if a bitcoin owner wants to be revived he can choose cryonics and retain memories, to which I answered that it would be really hard to do.

The deal is not whether we can revive a person and if the chances are 5% or 10%, but if that person will continue to live after. What's the point of reviving someone if that person dies a week later due to a failure of immune system or gets Alzheimer's?

All these people you've mentioned are well informed in theory and that's the important part. This is nothing but theory. How can we claim that someone is right or wrong when there's no proof of either?