In my opinion, Jack Dorsey is just one of the many crypto enthusiasts. Nothing more.

Guys, can we allow Satoshi some breathing space?
We are just getting done with Craig Wright and other faketoshis. What he would want from us is to focus on bitcoin rather than trying to unravel a mystery that would not essentially affect bitcoin.
Jack Dorsey is not Satoshi. We can identify another similarity with someone else, a crypto enthusiasts who has this same outline.
This is what Hal Finney would have had to deal with if he were alive(God rest his soul)

Are all of the interviews in the trailer original? I got the feeling that several of them were interviews I saw many years ago, though I could be wrong.

My current feeling on Satoshi's identity is:
 - Sassaman is a very bad candidate. If this is their conclusion, then they totally failed to do proper research.
 - 50% chance it's someone nobody's ever heard of, and nobody will ever figure it out
 - 35% chance it's Hal Finney. (Over time, I've moved more probability into this category.)
 - 10% chance it's someone else in the Bitcoin-verse
 - 5% chance it's a group within the CIA

But I'm really not a fan of the whole "search for Satoshi" genre. Being anonymous, Satoshi is an excellent myth and source of inspiration, since we can't see much of his flawed humanity. Mythical-Satoshi is a humble man who, with a lot of persistence and skill, but not with a level of brilliance beyond the reach of us mortals, single-handedly created a clockwork device so powerful that it shook the world. And then, in an action which nobody in the traditional halls of power would ever take, he had the wisdom to walk away: a modern Cincinnatus. I like that myth very much, and I'd rather it not be tainted by association with an actual human.

There are many interesting coincidences in the article. I see the possibility of Jack Dorsey being Satoshi as close to zero. Finding these coincidences is intriguing, but those who want to create conspiracy theories can make such connections. For example, Jack Dorsey's birthday is November 19. It's said that Satoshi registered on the forum on November 19, but the admin account was created on November 18. If there had been an event linking Jack Dorsey to November 18, it would have been mentioned and used.
In my opinion, Jack Dorsey is just one of the many crypto enthusiasts. Nothing more.

Jack Dorsey birthday is 19th November, which is actually the day Satoshi created his account in the forum. Meanwhile, Satoshi being Jack Dorsey had decided to create the admin account the eve to their birthday for testing purposes.
So, Jack Dorsey is Satoshi. Now we have exposed the long hidden secret, what next?

Snipped

Guys, can we allow Satoshi some breathing space?
We are just getting done with Craig Wright and other faketoshis. What he would want from us is to focus on bitcoin rather than trying to unravel a mystery that would not essentially affect bitcoin.
Jack Dorsey is not Satoshi. We can identify another similarity with someone else, a crypto enthusiasts who has this same outline.
This is what Hal Finney would have had to deal with if he were alive(God rest his soul)