I'm really tired of people who keep asking, "Who is Satoshi?" or who make desperate attempts and spend a lot of time trying to prove that someone is Satoshi!!!

I've said it before many times: if Satoshi wanted to reveal his identity, he would have done so easily. Why would he, when he has tried so hard to conceal his identity?

Let's respect the decision of the great creator of Bitcoin, who sacrificed fame, money, and everything else for the sake of this beautiful icon. Let him disappear in peace.

seriously unless satoshi himself revealed his identity all of these theory, doesn't matter how complex it is, will just be a speculation, because nobody knows who satoshi really is and there's not enough evidence.
like as you said, it's better to just let satoshi identity remains unknown, because that seems to be his intention, so why bother.

When I saw the title of this thread, I thought to myself 'here we go again, an argument that leads to nowhere, a few theories here and there and the topic will be obsolete like the others. If by any remote chance it becomes true that Hal Finney, was Satoshi Nakamoto, what impact will it mean for Bitcoin today? I guess none, Hal, is late, so it's not like he'd be answering any questions for Satoshi, if it's finally proven that they're the same. Our take home is that Satoshi Nakamoto, created Bitcoin and decided to be anonymous, which is great for Bitcoin that is decentralized and represents privacy and freedom for it's holders.

Here comes another unproven theory of who is speculated to be the real identity behind the anonymous Satoshi Nakamoto. Tomorrow, another person will also come up with another theory to also convince us that a certain individual or group of persons is(are) Satoshi Nakamoto. We've heard enough of this cock and bull theories but what I don't know is why some of us in the forum are still trying to prove a valueless point.
If for any reason you discover who really Satoshi Nakamoto is, what value will that knowledge add to you? Think about this question so you can stop spamming us with similar unnecessary theories

It is vey strange indeed and I might guess that he was trying to get Satoshi (whoever he is) to attend because of his novel invention.

But who knows why he posted that.

It would indeed be weird if he was referring to himself in the third person, because I do not know who is able to put up with that for so long.