I use DCA strategy because I don't have time to watch the graph.

It's too gambling for using lump sum strategy, imagine you're flipping most of your wealth, not easy when you choose to buy at bottom, not easy when you hold, not easy when you want to sell at high.

Half DCA and half lump sum seems to be more make sense, at least you have back up from your DCA.

I buy Bitcoin when I feel it's the right time to buy, and I sell when I think that the bubble is about to burst. If we have a look at my past trades, I'd say that I manage it very successfully. DCA might be the safest bet for many people, but I prefer my approach because it results in significantly better profit. One thing that helps me into this is that I never rush, I wait months or a year to choose the perfect moment to buy Bitcoins and hold them. Even when I buy, I hold for a long time to see the pinnacle of the market. Recently, I sold my Bitcoins for around $100K and then bought them again at $85K. Today the price is around $88K and I'm sure it's only going to rise.
At the moment, anything under $100K is a win win.

What can I say - happy hodling is a great process to witness, as there is no nerve spent on it.

Wonderful to see people appreciating the value of BTC which only becomes bigger and bigger.

Threads and replies keep raising the subject about DCA, it's a nice approach to invest in Bitcoin. Some investors do well with strategies other than they do with DCA, not everyone is grounded to a particular approach, i don't think a healthy investment is solidly grown from implementing just through the act of DCA, there should be involvement of other kinds, the goal is reaching a desirable level of investment in the most convenient economical state.

DCA method remains the most effective way to accumulate and grow your investment, the strategy accommodates every class of the society, anybody that earns income can accumulate at their own pace. Also the fast adoption of Bitcoin as an asset to invest in is due to a common fact that anybody can start with a very small amount of money. When you are on DCA for the long term, you will not panic or get overexcited when Bitcoin price dumps or pumps, what you are looking forward to is seeing ATH at every bull circles. Buying with a lump sum is also good but it is more profitable if the person will wait for dip before buying so that they will get a lot of profits in bull run.

Anything goes imo. Whatever you're current financial state can handle should be the one that you should follow. Granted a lenient entry (meaning almost any point) would probably take years before it bears any fruit, and I reckon we won't be seeing any crazy x20 profits anymore, so don't get your hopes up. I reckon it'd be a lot better to invest in something else if you want something more stable-ish. Only invest in crypto if you want risky investments but also risky profits.

Personally I'd go for DCA, but at this point in the cycle would probably be better to buy in and just hodl for a few short months instead of years. Just reset and start the DCA instead maybe by 2026 or so.

buy with the strategy that works well for you. If your income can only allow you to DCA, focus on DCA and don't try other methods; just stick to what is working for you. If your income can allow you to DCA and do lump sum or buy at the DIP, it is best never to hesitate in doing so. The reason why the DCA investment plan is what is trending and the most popular is that, be you an entry-level investor or an old investor with a lot of allocation for your investment, you can still make use of it.

DCA, when done the right way, encompasses every other method because you will have to buy at the different prices at the different times you have slotted out for your purchase. Some of us might even be accumulating our BTC using the DCA method without actually knowing it.

Whichever method you choose is okay, but when you decide not to buy and hodl, you do yourself no good. As for me, I don't have a big purse to make a one time bitcoin purchase in millions or thousands of dollars. So DCA is the convenient method for me. As the money comes, I buy with my spare cash and I've been doing that for some time now and it's going to payoff on a long run.

If the results are there - it doesn't matter how exactly you would change your strategy. It would still work, and it's the question of min-maxing the potential PNL.

There is always room to adapt

Every method works if you can use it properly, it depends entirely on how you use it.
The DCA is the easiest investment strategy to got into, it's cost effective since it's up to the investor to choose how much they invest periodically for the number of cycles they wish to hodl for, while still on DCA, an investor can decide to Scale (increase the amount of money the use to buy bitcoin periodically, lets say from $10 to $20, an investor can also decide to make additional $10 increase every month).
Somewhere along the way while they are still investing, the can get their hands on a large amount of discretionary income and decide to pour all of it into their investment, this is basically lump sum investment. If they are lucky and this large amount of money get to them during a DIP and there decide to invest, you can call it lump sum investment and also buying the DIP.
So every investment strategy works as long as you use them the right way.