He wants to let the United States Department of Homeland Security to reveal who Satoshi Nakamoto is. Stating that they know who Satoshi is.
Yes, I've read the news
Lawyer sues US homeland dept to probe supposed Satoshi Nakamoto meeting, There was an interesting thing in this case before MetaLawman sued there was a question asked by Cointelegraph to James Murphy.
Question #1: What is your gut feelingdo you think the DHS actually interviewed the real Satoshi?
Answer: I think its very possible that the DHS agent was mistaken in what she said at that conference. I think DHS agents may have met with bitcoin code maintainers, or with actual Satoshi imposters. But, who knows? The DHS agent was a pretty high ranking official and was in a position to know what she was talking about. Either way, I think it will be productive to find out and hopefully resolve this question. Nothing prevents DHS from voluntarily revealing the information without need for protracted litigation.
Question #2: If the agency did speak with the four creators who may be ordinary US citizens why do you believe revealing their identities serves the public interest, even if it could put their safety or privacy at risk?
Answer: I dont understand the question. The identities of the creators of all of the largest blockchain projects, like Charles Hoskinson and Vitalik Buterin etc., are all well known in the crypto community. There are also many major figures like Michael Saylor, Tim Draper and others who have amassed enormous wealth through investment in bitcoin and their identities are well known.
If I observe the interests proposed to James Murphy and the answer, I'm sure the case of Satoshi Nakamoto's identity has never been revealed, even though there are claims from certain parties they have spoken or so on, it is in vain MetaLawman lawsuit.
