Is there any correlation between bitcoin and gold being illegal? I could twist it to find something similar but it would honestly sound too much of a reach. I do not know if this is where it came from but the birth date of Satoshi really had no source and it was nothing but speculation. Though I would say it is quite ironic that at some point, holding gold was illegal. One could say that bitcoin was almost a reminiscent of that.

What a nice discovery about April 5 irrespective of the year, at least we have something to celebrate as an opportunity on this same date, once we can see what has been in place before and what the said day of the month of April has brought to humanity, we can see that its something worth celebrating, i now see why the other thread talks about US being the ones behind the name Satoshi and this was argued by other members because it lack evidence.

There are many events, developments that play as foundations for Bitcoin and they are parts of Bitcoin Prehistory.

If people can use this event related to gold and the USA's Federal Reserve Bank policy change against their citizens, as a reason for appointing it as Satoshi Nakamoto's birthday, there are more other events can be used similarly.

Bitcoin prehistory shows that before 1975, there are developments for A Protocol for Pocket Network Intercommunication and in later years there are other developments from cryptography to some first cryptocurrencies.

Funny be the case, what if this as duly noted "Satohsi Nakamoto" happens to be a group of persons and we are just here making blind guesture and arguing about it?
The speculations surrounding the identity of Satohsi has been a much trending here, when do we get to an end to it? Because I know even when anyone is paraventurely get to the real detail of him with documents evidence, we would still doubt and argue it.
Having someone come out in reality with the claim of being the Satoshi will not still get us satisfied.
So what really do we want? And what is the way forward to get this done if not let go about the speculative detectorships.

The most famous Faketoshi is Craig Wright that was debunked by many people including Jameson Lopp and COPA trial.

Craig Wright's Copyright claim.
How many wrongs make a Wright?

When people completely failed in finding identity of Satoshi Nakamoto, they tried to do something more funny, assigning a special day as a birthday of Satoshi Nakamoto. This action is very arbitrary and I disagree with any day assigned as the Bitcoin founder's birthday. If people can do arbitrary choice like this, in future others might do other arbitrary things towards Satoshi Nakamoto while they don't have anything to back their choices. Nothing good with arbitrary actions just to satisfy the crowd, and it can be sources of fud, if it is not about birthday but related to something else.

Is it that these unproven speculations are steadily being peddled around the media to spark debates? Realistically, there's nothing evidential enough to prove that these constant speculations are true. Today we're discussing Satoshi's birthday, tomorrow, someone will also come up with another speculations about a man that's remained anonymous since the he introduced Bitcoin as a project. What do people really want to do with his identity and personal life?

What is there to speculate about? This has nothing to do with the birthday of Satoshi. It has to do with Satoshi himself listing April 5, 1975 as his birthday on the P2P foundation and why he did that (why, is most likely due to relation to the Executive Order 6102). It is not about speculating about the real birth date of satoshi. It is about the meaning of April 5, which Satoshi Nakamoto listed on their P2P Foundation profile (1, 2):


April 5, 1975 is not speculation, Satoshi Nakamoto himself listed this data, sourced below in a previous post


A lot of you seem to have not read the contents of the thread, making idiotic comments about Satoshi Nakamoto's actual birth date, when this is not the subject, in fact it has nothing to do with the birth date of satoshi nakamoto, but the meaning of what he himself had put on his P2P Foundation profile as his birth date, which represents Executive Order 6102.

This topic is turning into a fly trap for people who don't read entirety of topics/OP it seems