Sooner or later, maybe..
But would it happen in this cycle, in your opinion? I think we are far from the summary from bigger entities, maybe only in our heads, because BTC becomes only bigger and bigger in every way, conceptual and price-wise..

With or without such support, BTC would grow, but slower, that's definitely - so the adoption leads to new heights much faster that we could of expected

Maybe I wrote it a bit wrongly, but that's exactly what I thought - bears wouldn't watch for others whether it's okay to make something, or not - they would just do it.

And they would just go for BTC when they will not have that much suspicion to it.

That is why it needs accuracy so that the writing is not wrong and I think it's natural because maybe everyone has made a mistake. Returning to the topic of discussion and we know that Bitcoin is a hedge so there is no other way to take this approach to maintain the value of the currency we have because I believe that holding the Fiat currency to be saved is an inappropriate decision.

The tendency of the strategy used by large investors to accumulation may be different from small investors, but we need to take advantage of the opportunities that exist in order to make us more developed in the pattern of collecting bitcoin so that the assets will slowly increase by itself.

I didn't say that it's definitely going to happen during the current cycle, but I said that we will get our answer AFTER the current cycle.

I say the "current cycle" because this is the only part of Bitcoin's existence when ETFs have already been approved for easy deployment of capital from institutions. They can't be all be like Chad Saylor.

It is funny how they italicized this line as if they are emphasizing this negative performance of Bitcoin:

If this article is really factual, they should also mention the price of acquisition, the peak profit, the substancial unrealized losses and the current investment-profit ratio of the said Bitcoin holdings of these institutions. But they did not, they ony capitalized on the unrealized losses computed on the peak unrealized gain during the Bitcoin ATH. 

We all know these companies acquired this Bitcoin at very low prices, lower than the current price.  If newbies read the article they will be misinformed about the actual profit of these companies.  But yeah don't fret too much about this biased article, after all people who understand how Bitcoin works knows the actual situation of Bitcoin.  Those people who wants quick profit will certainly lose but those who are in for the long run will be the ones to gain profit.

That said, Bitcoin is a better way to store our funds compared to ever increasing inflation of fiat currency thus Bitcoin is a hedge against inflation yesterday, today, and in the future.

I just hope BTC will go beyond the reserves period we are witnessing now.

The next step would be to adopt BTC for bigger purchases.

Day-to-day transactions with BTC is always nice to think about and hear, but I do think it won't happen in a long time to come (hear about some developments like that in Switzerland and their chain of shops, can't remember exactly which one), whereas allowing for BTC being used to buy a car, for example - would be a good start, imo.

If anything, bigger players started to listen to what BTC may bring to them as well - and some of them are going out of their ways to keep the accumulation processes steady.

1 BTC will always be 1 BTC, even though its value would change, there will be no more BTC than it should be, unlike the fiat, which you talked about.