If we're to divide the total number of El Salvador population approximating at 6M by 0.002 BTC = 206.43 USD per capita which is far lower to the op 0.01527 BTC per capita ($1,573) for Bhutan. Like I said above, what really matters is that these two countries has a good number of bitcoin holdings and are still unrelenting in the accumulation process.
I had already heard of Bhutan but I didn't even know where it was and I learned a lot of things by reading all these articles. However, it's true that I have a little trouble with numbers... (in addition to geography)
To calculate again, I had to ask for help (GROK):
Bhutan:Population: 800,000 inhabitants (approximate, based on recent data).
Bitcoin Holdings: 12,062 BTC.Total Value of Bitcoin Holdings: 12,062 BTC × $103,000/BTC =
$1,242,386,000 USD.BTC Value per Capita: $1,242,386,000 ÷ 800,000 =
$1,552.98 USD per capita.BTC per Capita: 12,062 ÷ 800,000 =
0.0150775 BTC per capita (approximately 0.0151 BTC).El Salvador:Population: 6,400,000 inhabitants (approximate, based on recent data).
Bitcoin Holdings: 6,174 BTC.Total Value of Bitcoin Holdings: 6,174 BTC × $103,000/BTC =
$635,922,000 USD.BTC Value per Capita: $635,922,000 ÷ 6,400,000 =
$99.36 USD per capita.BTC per Capita: 6,174 ÷ 6,400,000 =
0.0009646875 BTC per capita (approximately 0.00096 BTC).Bhutan has a significantly higher BTC value per capita ($1,552.98 USD) compared to El Salvador ($99.36 USD),
approximately 15.6 times higher (1,552.98 ÷ 99.36 ≈ 15.63).