^ Bitcoin shouldn't become the 100% alternative to fiat, because it's not its killer - it's an alternative, as it was said 

Naturally.

BTC isn't suited, as for now, to become something as used as fiat - and it's tested with time much more by everybody, thus, to take its rightful place, much more time is needed.

Bitcoin is the next generation of money. We went from gold to paper to electronic bits and bytes and now we are at the decentralized open source version of money. If I had to guess the next stage it would be something to do with quantum entanglement aka. action at a distance, removing the aspect of requiring the internet all together.

But it's just natural, is it not? Everything evolves and changes. Technology, biology, society... Why not money as well?

I think Bitcoin is the next step. Not the killer. And future adoption is guaranteed.

Bitcoin is not a pot of gold and shouldn't be considered a get rich quick opportunity. Yes, it presents a beneficial opportunity, but we shouldnt ignore its disadvantage and choose to over hype Bitcoin because this has led to the misconception of alot of newbies about Bitcoin as an investment.

Yes, you're right about this, but the government not only promotes the use of Bitcoin as a solution through the institutional banking restriction, daily spending quotas, a long process if you want to withdraw huge funds, and its level of control over people's funds. They also promote the use of Bitcoin through their selfish printing of fiat currency, which is causing inflation, and I could remember years ago, this was the number one reason people started seeing Bitcoin as the solution.