What a strange response. I hope that's not the quality of discussion on this forum.
No, I can assure you it's not.
All unspent BTC at the time of a future quantum fork would be redirected to a shared treasury address
The biggest issue we are having with such proposals is that
Reassigning breaks the principle of absolute ownership and undermine such protocol.
Treasury governance would use multisig or delegated voting mechanisms to enable community input.
Who defines the Multisig participants? How can centralization be prevented?
Recall laws in man's hand can be misuse unlike numbers and codes.
About the abandoned term? What year would count as abandoned?
We recently just saw a coin moved after 14 years
Now that's something.
I think there was a suggestion to prevent this that an announcement should be made and time given for implementation.
DeFi-based loans against the holdings would be used to fund projectsThis would really help in utilising the lost coins but the ones championing it is an issue in my opinion.
Let's not rule out the risk of paper Bitcoin (rehypothcation).
