Bitcoin has actually made a financial revolution, where Bitcoin has innovations that no one can ignore. And Bitcoin has scarcity, where it makes the value even higher. These things attract many people to adopt Bitcoin. So I think the government can no longer ignore the power of Bitcoin's innovation. In the end they chose to collaborate with it through adoption. We can see in the past, where Bitcoin was very difficult to accept or even received a lot of criticism from well-known people who thought Bitcoin would become completely worthless. However currently there are no more negative comments about it. And I think this is because of Trump's effect or even maybe Salvador's effect, where they have caused other countries to start adopting it just like the United States and El Salvador. Well in the end everyone will consider Bitcoin to be more valuable than gold, where Bitcoin has a truly limited supply. Meanwhile it is not yet known whether gold has a limited supply. So I personally believe that Bitcoin will become legal tender if a country initiates it. And I am sure that country will be the winner, where that country will have many advantages by doing so.

You are correct that Bitcoin limited supply of 21 million coins and its decentralized nature make it very attractive. You are also right that governments are no longer ignoring it and major events like El Salvador making it legal tender and Donald Trump becoming more positive about it have encouraged this change. Your idea that country would win by adopting Bitcoin as legal tender is bold prediction but so far only El Salvador and the Central African Republic have taken that step.

Smaller countries are first to answer such calls, imo.

They have the desire to try new things out to have the edge over those that are not so eager to work with something new, BTC in this example.

I think no, as far as I know if the government focuses on the adoption of bitcoin, instead I think it will affect the crypto market and bitcoin value, not as a valid payment currency.

On the one hand Bitcoin is currently made by the government as boosting the country's economy, they can benefit from large amounts of bitcoin adoption.
For example:
Today the government adopted 1000 Bitcoin at a price of $ 100k they could sell to the price of $ 101K they had gained a profit of $ 1 million and so on.

So, the adoption of bitcoin by the government, if I predict it will actually make the value or price of bitcoin much higher, the government does not aim as a valid payment, it does not work efficiently, El Salvador has done it.

I am already beginning to feel that bitcoiners are asking for too much. Years back, all we needed was a friendly environment for bitcoiners to use bitcoin openly without fear. Now we already have that privilege we so wanted yet some bitcoiners won't rest until bitcoin becomes a legal tender. I do not see the need imposing bitcoin on anyone. Bitcoin stands for freedom, making it a legal is good but it will thereafter be binding on all citizens to accept it whether they like it or not. I don't welcome the idea of treating Bitcoin same way fiat is being treated. Just give me my freedom to use bitcoin, I will trade p2p with those who value bitcoin transactions just like me.

Yes, we're asking a lot from them where we didn't do that back then. A simple and slow adoption is what we like before and it did happen. I guess it's just part of the success of bitcoin that we want to see the adoption across these countries and come to the decision of making it a legal tender. But we have to understand that not all of them are going to adopt it as El Salvador has done. They have a different idea of it and it might not be that important to them so, they are not talking about serious adoption such as it being a legal tender.

This adoption will be inevitable; many governments have already adopted bitcoin as a reserve, and failing to do so would mean falling behind economically. As this trend continues to intensify, I think it's quite likely that bitcoin will become a legal tender, not replacing fiat currency, but working alongside it in the daily economic life of nations.

And even does that have resources are always after the tax of the citizens and more you get the more you get taxed and what people need to understand by now is that when it come to taxing the government is always taking it serious and that is why if anyone is caught invading tax they are always charged to court. And people that are in a country were bitcoin is legal they will definitely pay tax because it's a source of income the moment you are making profit the government is taking its own percentage.

There are countries that don't use there tax for a good thing and they keep embezzling the money there citizens are baying as tax and I don't even know why the government will want to tax everything before they can develop the country there are countries that are tax free countries like Dubai and that is why you see a lot of people running there to do there businesses and this is just another way to Bring investors to there country. There countries that everything you do you are paying tax and that is actually very bad. The government should look for other ways to generate revenue and not just by taxing  there citizens the way they like they can actually do better by even creating more opportunities for employment, they just choose to do what they want with there citizens.

You summed it up well—Bitcoin challenges the very foundation of how governments manage money. Adoption at a state level is unlikely because it removes their ability to print and control supply. But that’s also why individuals value it so much—it gives financial power back to the people.