-snipie
Campaign manager of anonchange (whose signature nullius is wearing) just forgot one rule to add, 'campaign manager reserves right to bend rules at his own discretion'.
Rules are rules and it should be respected otherwise the service will be considered as untrustworthy and the manager too. They are dealing with money, how can we trust them if they don't follow their own rules?
Right that's why I said what I said (refer to quote), CM just forgot one rule to add which would have nullified other rules and would have made hiring nullius in their campaign
ok.
On note, I noticed you used -snipie for snipped text. Not sure how I feel about it but I noticed and I want you to know that I noticed.
You mentioned eager to collect money. Well if you can collect $50 a week, then this could be considered as a good revenue in some countries with low wages. Satanfanius is most likely from a fifth world country so losing his side job will force him to find another trick.
(referring to italic part) I didn't mention anything like that. I meant to say, wouldn't people with as good as technical knowledge as Satofan44 or nullius for that matter would be having better means to capitalize on their knowledge than to join signature campaigns. It was a rhetorical question since I feel with that kinda knowledge, you certainly can get a gig with better pay than signature payments which tops at $400 a month for majority of users and in best case scenario.
This was my comment:
I wonder people with that good of a technical knowledge, wouldn't they be having better means to capitalize on their knowledge than to join signature campaigns?
If he was clever and busy enough, he wouldn't lose his time insulting people and risking his career.
For some people, having security also does that to you.
Rules are rules and it should be respected otherwise the service will be considered as untrustworthy and the manager too. They are dealing with money, how can we trust them if they don't follow their own rules?
Please do not defame my CM. What you say is absurd. If you have a problem with me, take it up with me (in which case, Ill ignore you because youre not worth it). (referring to italic part) Another reason why this guy is not Satofan44, cause Satofan44 would get on with anybody, everybody.
Anyone who reads the math and crypto literature knows that numbers dont care about gender; I routinely see papers by woman professors who are so much smarter than I am, it hurts my brain to read their work.
...And here is me, who finds meself dumb when I read your content.
On irrelevant note, I learned to anchor text from your posting although I haven't tried yet. I always appreciated it on websites, never knew you could do it here too.
.why do you care? There only legitimate reason to care about linking alts is some type of fraud: Financial fraud (e.g., taking multiple slots in the same signature campaign), social fraud (sockpuppeting to fake social validation of your opinions), etc. Otherwise, the intrepid alt-hunters are either spies who hate privacy, or batshit crazy obsessive paranoiacs who see faces in the clouds, and messages from space aliens in static on TV.
I genuinely believe they do this out of self-interest, for merit, recognition, and sometimes in the hope of becoming a moderator of some sort. I think these people are the kids who used to snitch to their teachers when they were just little cunts
I'll do you better, it's for signature quota. I swear man, people bash gambling board for shitposting meanwhile, I find Reputation board same, it's just different kinda shitposting and comparatively better.
As for accusing nullius of being "Satofan44", I highly doubt it, because Satofan44 is indeed both boring and a cunt, whereas nullius is generally interesting.
I wouldn't call Satofan44 boring, but you do you, plus Satofan44 has made you read his content so you could rate him to,
boring and cunt which is an achievement in itself.
I haven't interacted with "Free Market Capitalist", and I don't exactly remember my interactions with "Poker Player", [...]
To be clear, its the same account (same uid) that changed names. This is proved by the web.archive.org snapshots that I linked.
It is and nobody is denying it (including op).
As for accusing nullius of being "Satofan44", I highly doubt it, because Satofan44 is indeed both boring and a cunt, whereas nullius is generally interesting.
Thank you graciously. My only potential objection: Is Satofan44 truly a cunt? Cunts are sweet, and I have neither investigated nor quantified (nor tasted) Satofan44s level of sweetness, or lack thereof.
Well, his posts are there to see.
Personally, I'd rate Satofan44 asshole generally, but if you'd flatter him, then he would become a cunt which is comparatively better (
please, don't bring physical anatomy into this for how this is possible).
Regarding op re-opening the thread because s/he thinks nullius is Satofan44 I feel that, unless one has concrete evidence, stop throwing accusations around and stop wasting people's time. If people could have clarity about their actions, how little they would act.
Edit: Typo
