If this amount will be too big people will not like this..

there is another poll for the bounties and giveaway fraction.

https://bt.irlbtc.com/view/557616.0

I agree with you!
We need it if we do not want this coin dead.

Sleep well, thank you for your engagement.

Dear Dev,

I am thinking about why the CommunityCoin has gotten the attacks.
I think that the selections have been biased by your subjective judgment.
You made the rule 1, rule 2, rule 3 and rule 4, and later added the rule 5.
Some guys are totally qualified according to your rules, but rejected wrongly by your subjective judgment.
They spent time on applying and they thought they should be rewarded as they were qualified.
But they didn't get coins. They got angry. That's it. I understand if I met the same case I will be angry too.
You are pursuing the fairness in your only heart. But it's unfair for other guys.


Some thoughts about the "punishment":
crypto-dude said those early stakeholders who dumped their coins will be punished.
I think it's not a right idea. That's one of the reason I said that something has been biased by your subjective judgment.  There is not rules preventing them dumping. They didn't break any rules.
What the dev should be responsible of is to distribute the coin relatively fairly.
After that, just let it go!  Someone will buy and others will sell. Let's go like a free market.



[Before sleep]

I don't want to say for dev, that I think he would probably temporary agreed for that. You can try.

Dev, what say you?

I hope in this case the mods unlock the original thread. A curated distribution is going to cause butthurt, and sour grapes shouldn't close down a good thread that was allowing a dedicated community base to emerge alongside applications for inclusion.

Trolls were fairly well ignored, application rules were followed and broken, and a number of members were having relevant discussion about the developmental needs and aspirations of the coin. That conversation could of course be moved to another forum, but I think the vast majority of those involved consider BTCtalk a sort of "homebase" forum for altcoin discussion.

Furthermore, the option of starting another thread on BTCtalk disallows newcomers from investigating the nascent stages of the coin.

I appeal to the mods to re-consider the lock on the thread, and humbly request clarification on the reason for doing so.

Yes of cource you can place your reason to apply here, and fill rest of forms we're still continuing delivery.

Regarding the matter, posted here an update:

http://ecoiner.org/communitycoin/dailymodo-report-locked-thread-bitcointalk-1569/#post7422

If thread stay closed for another 24 hours, i open  you open a new one soon. But this time i hope no body false report us.

new thread is here
https://bt.irlbtc.com/view/558011.msg6080042#msg6080042

COMM team could gather all participation requests until a certain date. Then the rest coins could be distributed with a RANDOM selection. I think it is very FAIR. There is no subjectivity, there is FATE and LUCK.