Interesting approach: a penalty for being inactive, but a bonus for still earning Merit

@OP: How is Symmetrick going to get a fitting quality score?

Wonderful idea *ace*
I can't say whether it would be feasible to create an algorithm capable of providing a definitive assessment of quality!
It would certainly be an excellent indicator! I have faith in you, as you've had some great ideas with your small projects so far.

I think the idea os good, but we already have so many features in the profile:
Merit, trust, activity, and even other very good third party indicator (bpip rank)
https://bpip.org

I think bpip is good because it does cover everything somehow...

This is actually a nice move with an added advantage to the new.. as I believe this is first thing that is introduced as the beginning of this year 2026. Well, this is nice and I would also want to know my score level.

Please if there is possibility do not hesitate to post it here for me let me view my score as well. Again I want to also where this can be useful on the forum or where to use it when there is need for it.

Very interesting tool, congratulations on the dedication to build it and share it with us. Regarding quality, I can say that this is quite relative and there are countless variables involved. That said, I believe that the vast majority of people who are more active forum users know each other well, after all, we are practically always the same people around here, and this creates an organic quality baseline where everyone knows who is who.

Therefore, it might be interesting to leave part of the tool customizable (I don’t even know if that is possible), so each person could personalize it according to what they consider to be quality or not.

This high score is the reason I asked It should be something like "-999 -- Former Elite"

The formula will penalise him even more if he does not become active again, but it will not bring him down to zero; it will stop at a maximum of 10% of the total.
See satoshi for a better understanding.
It does not seem fair to me to remove all the points. For better or worse, these users have been part of Bitcointalk's history, so I must give them some recognition, even though I do not know either of them. 

What the hell? The posts are all empty and archived!
How can he have all these Merits?
Unfortunately, however, it is not an error in the formula! It is a borderline and isolated case, I would say.

Tell me if something like this would work:
Post120 === 0
Merit120 === 0
Inactivity > 2 years

Final score = 0 dormant former elite
Reputation score = score given by the formula

I did an evaluation of this greasemonkey script (by preferred app) Bitcointalk quality score — Greasyfork


- Limited Permissions: The script correctly uses GM_xmlhttpRequest... goood
- Clear Namespace and Authorization: Metadata (@name, @author, @license MIT) are defined.. double good
- No Obfuscated Code: The code is readable and not obfuscated, allowing for a complete analysis... triple good
- Error Handling: Includes try...catch blocks and handles error cases in API calls, avoiding visible crashes, good x 4
- Be aware that you are trusting bitlist.co to read some of your browsing data, but bitlist.co is safe, so ok
- The script reads public data (posts, credits, dates) from the Bitcointalk profile page and sends it to bitlist.co to calculate advanced statistics. Bitlist.co is safe, so it's ok; just reminder There is no direct risk to the security of your account, but this operation may not be in line with your privacy expectations.



for me this code is ok