What forum is this? I couldn't find it, nor such additional information. I did find the accountsu/b1ack andu/b1exch on dread, I would link but I'm assuming it's not allowed.

There is the same promotion for b1ack stash fromu/b1ack:post/2d9634a222623f0cf28c
You can verify the b1exch and b1ack accounts frompost/54f593fbdaba1406fe9f/


Edit: Also the subreddit itself d/bl1ack, admin is (unsurprisingly)u/b1ack; the same b1ack that is able to verify b1exch signature above, because they are in control of the exchange as well.




So I don't think there is any doubt here about it being the same operator, you can verify it for yourself.

Yes, I know, money is above moral principles.

I talked to this user which was rug pulled and he told me that you refunded his loss (partially,  as the loss was too big). That was a nice attitude.

Quite unfortunately .... We must always be cautious. I always send money in batches, even to big exchanges such as binance.

No one will care and no one using their service is different thing. They are advertising their platform so that everyone in forum will use their service , it will generate a revenues for themselves also. I'm not a regular user of B1exch but I used this couple of times. Idk if I can pull myself together to use their service again.

They can't run longtime advertising if only the campaign participants are using their services. I hope till now no one has been effected. They did have a huge reserve on bitcoin and other crypto also a hefty amount escrowed. I won't be surprised if anyone is swaping couple of bitcoin on their platform in a single transaction.

We don't know how b1exch was funded, but we do know it's operated by b1ack. What we also know is that "b1ack's stash" predates b1ack exchange, this post –post/4a4f32bd7b9812f58c21 – dates back to June 2024.



Before then were a couple of comprehensive guides published "A Comprehensive Guide to Carding" and "Understanding Card Checkers: A Comprehensive Guide" (/post/3103afe2ba5693580e3b andpost/5e4a42b6e08d6c9ee532), and they otherwise were active ind/Carding, prior to launching b1ach stash (followed by b1ack exchange sometime later). This post caught my eye however (/post/1bdd851413f6766598e2):



I'll also quote the notable part, in order to avoid any ambiguity here:


Then according to Cyberint, in September 2025 "b1ack's stash" had domains seized. I checked the latest domain, it remains operational.


Source: https://cyberint.com/blog/other/b1acks-stash-a-comprehensive-analysis-of-the-free-1-million-card-leak/

Then b1exch was launched, in January 2026 if not mistaken. Hopefully that settles the timeline here in absence of any further explanation.

---

Alas none of this is against the forum rules as others have pointed out and b1exch (as a service) hasn't done anything wrong here as far as I'm aware.

As long as those supporting/using this service are aware of it's operator running a darkweb market that was previously seized, then there isn't much else to add.

20 million + ids  

post/92aedf9798f26c7500fc/#c-0220a54e1379fea3ef



also why he is looking that?   

You are asking if it is fine to advertise a business started with stolen money, while at the same time dodging questions about another business started with stolen money.

In either case, I don’t think people being paid to advertise them are interested in really scrutinizing where those businesses’ funding is coming from.

In the situation of b1exch, all of their addresses are publicly known and until this day there hasn’t been any evidence that they are funded by stolen money. Without direct financing from that carding service, there is going to be a higher degree of tolerance in what people are willing to advertise.

I just found this discussion right now and I am very frustrated to see that yet another no Know Your Customer platform may turn out to actually be only another gigantic disappointment on a long list of disappointments.  Considering I am still part of this Signature Campaign, I know my words may not even be taken in to consideration by many of you but I will still write down my thoughts.

To be honest with you.  I do not even know how to think about this situation.  In situations where Privacy is offered as a feature, I generally do not care who the person behind the screen is.  I argued this a while ago on the Forum about Satoshi, back when there was a rumor that Epstein was the creator of Bitcoin.  While I definitely hate Epstein, it does not mean that ANY idea of his is stupid and even if he is proved to be Satoshi, Bitcoin should not immediately become worth nothing.  That would be stupid.  Yet we do not have any idea who Satoshi is and we are using his or their product knowing he or they may own as much as a Million Bitcoin that they may dump on us.

Yes he did not FUND Bitcoin but I hope you get what I am trying to say.  The face behind the mask could actually be one of the worst criminals history has seen.

Anyway.  This was an explanation for why I do not generally care about the identity behind some things.  Look at who owns Meta, Amazon, Google et cetera and tell me with a serious face that they have never done really bad things while pretending they are innocent and helpful.  If you want to avoid all the evil then you will become immediately lonely.  Where there is a lot of Money, there is a lot of evil.  What I actually want to say is that while the creator of a platform that offers Privacy is at least in my opinion not necessary to show their identity, if what OP and the rest of you presented is actually real then it shows the kind of person he is.  And considering he owns an Exchange, if he is able to not give a single damn about how people feel when their identity or Money is taken away by a thief then why would he not be able to Exit Scam and not give a damn about how people feel.

In the same way.  Like someone else said in this Topic, there is pretty much a direct contradiction between presenting Privacy as a natural right and selling dumps, leaks, what ever else.  I would not do this because it would be like seriously demanding Privacy in the bath room while sneaking up on strangers taking a bath.  It would be against my principles.  Something does sound very dubious and right now it is very late and I am too tired but by the end of this week I will try to think this through and hopefully take the best decision.

I would like to see b1ack come back with a much more detailed answer containing more than just him saying he did not break any rule of the Forum but he has now been inactive for about 11 days already.

I do not 'Trust' anyone.  I in fact do every thing in such a way that I would be the least affected if any thing bad happens and I would suggest anyone that they do the same.

It could be Binance, b1exch, a no name Exchange or even non Finance related.  I prefer to verify Signatures from multiple devices or through multiple Virtual Machines and separate Internet connections or identities because I do not Trust what a single screen shows me.  When it comes to Exchanges, I prefer to split my total amount in to multiple smaller amounts I would afford risking to lose.

As an example, if I deposited 2,000 Dollars on a Centralized Exchange and they froze my funds until I prove my identity, it would be an amount large enough to put me in a position where I am almost forced to give up my Privacy so they can give me my amount back.  If I split that amount in multiple deposits of 200 Dollars or less, it would be a price I think I am ready to pay for not giving up my identity to a Third Party stranger.

The same thing applies in the scenario of using Exchanges.  If you spend 10,000 Dollars in one single Transaction expecting to get the other Cryptocurrency back then that is being naive even if it is the 'most Trusted Exchange', particularly considering that Centralized Exchanges would obviously rather crack down on and inspect larger Transactions.  In the same way, an Exchange that is ready to 'pull the rug' may have a mechanism that automatically does this when a multi Million Dollar Transaction shows up.  Splitting it up in smaller amounts may help not trigger it and constantly protect more than 90 percent of the total amount rather than protect zero and risk all.  I under lined before that even if no thing goes wrong with the Exchange itself such as pulling the rug or cracking down on your deposits, your Deposit could be sent right when a hacker is about to take all the Money out of the Wallets the Centralized Exchange holds.  I imagine a lot of people made Deposits right when the largest hacks in Bitcoin history have happened and I realized that my strategy could prevent a significant screw up.

Exchange 'CEOs' have done a lot of really bad things in the past.  So have some Developers, so have a lot of Casinos a lot of people liked and other Platforms or even some of the people who used to be loved here on Bitcoin Talk and turned in to Scammers.  I am so used to watching others be back stabbed, Scammed, robbed et cetera that I do not know if there is ANY Platform that should be considered great in the complete sense.  I can get a grasp of what the person may be like but if there is one certain thing, it is that people should NEVER be Trusted.

Anyway.  When I send my Bitcoin to a Third Party, I consider it already potentially lost.  And I think you can see in my Post History that whether it was a Politician, a CEO, an 'Influencer' or anyone else, I do not Trust them and I always think there may be something behind the 'great' things they are saying.  I instead rather resort to the 'hope' of getting what I expected back.  In this situation, receiving the Cryptocurrency I exchanged for.  After all, in most things we all rely on hope.