What's the problem with those accounts and why did all of them decide to wear Rainbet signature and avatar. Is it an indirect attack on the campaign for people to start calling the campaign a spam campaign?

Almost all those accounts are tagged, so why are they still struggling to be posting with AI. It's obvious, no manager is going to hire them.[/list]

I have read about this pattern before. I remember now...
But if I were to be a campaign manager, I would rather give someone not wearing signature a chance over someone in an active campaign already.
To them, wearing a signature is a passport to getting income campaigns, forgetting that campaign managers check out alot of other things including post history and how often one earns merit.

The pattern seems to be all the accounts are controlled by the same person, though there is not enough evidence of connecting accounts and abuse signature campaigns. Because I have checked on the Rainbet current spreadsheet, but they aren't paid participants. Not sure what the goal is of wearing Rainbet's signature voluntarily without any payments. Hhampuz isn't stupid to hire AI spammers, and probably he doesn't bother whoever is wearing the signature out of the spreadsheet.

I don't think these spammers have gotten any permission from the manager to wear the signature. The manager may not know who has been wearing the signature willingly without payment. So the goal of wearing a signature by these spammers remains unknown.

I saw a similar pattern, probably towards the end of last year if I recall well, but I didn't get enough time to investigate further. The account woke up at close time intervals and then wore Rainbet signatures without applying for the campaign.

I believe this is a trick to post around different boards so it does not raise eyebrows since they are wearing signatures.
The person behind them is taking advantage of the many participants in that campaign, so it's hard to know who is just wearing the signature for cover

I don't know if LoyceV or any technically gifted member can create a tool that can scrape through accounts wearing Rainbet signatures. I am sure we could get more accounts.

Yes, I know Hhampuz very well; he is very careful when selecting participants. If their goal is to prove being active, they might even continue spam posting without even wearing a signature. Most probably they have something else on their mind. Unless they wore the signature, even we might not notice them as a signature spammer. I think they wear the signature to convince other managers when they apply for another signature campaign. So the manager would get confused and might think they are a good poster at least since they have been wearing the Rainbet signature that is managed by Hhampuz.

If they don't have the RedTrust sign on the account, it still makes sense that they are trying to convince the manager as you say.
Since most of the accounts in OP have RedTrust, I think managers will turn a blind eye to hiring them.

I don't know what the motive is, I once saw in a Facebook group that someone was looking for a Bitcointalk account to buy, even though the account marked Redtrust he was also ready to buy. and I believe those accounts have been sold to the buyer of that account.

Maybe the lending section should also be on high alert for them as they may disguise as though the accounts are in signature campaigns, collect loans and disappear.

I tagged all the accounts I hadn't tagged already. The actions taken by the new owner more clearly than ever demonstrate the association between these accounts. They all put on the Rainbet avatar & sig, they all woke up at the same time, and they all posted AI gibberish in the same format. The accounts might not be banned but they are now worthless. Probably whoever bought them didn't really know what they were doing and got a raw deal.

I've given tons of those myself, including ones that were formerly negative (prior to the merit system).  Somewhere along the line I got the impression that neutral tags for post quality made no difference to campaign managers.  Do you happen to know if they do make a difference?

If so, I might take that up as a hobby again, because I'm damn certain bitcointalk can use all the help it can get in cleaning up the mess these shitposters leave all over the place. 

Speaking of that: I'd love to see a new section entitled "Landfill".  In it would go all of the posts deleted by mods via reports of shitposting from members (or noticed by mods on their own).  Then if any newcomer had any questions about what a low- or zero-value post is, they could just browse Landfill until they figured it out.