I suspect in a short time frame users using AI to post would post better content that jibberish signature poster are doing right now.
This is going to be a very huge problem for campaigns managers.

Now I'm curious.

Can you name a user with very good merit statistics who made 5 posts using AI in a single week, and specify which posts they were?

Yes, the scammers who use AI in wrong way always learn from everything but I'm pretty sure if they're so lazy that for making posts they use AI then such people might not give proper time to read what OP shared. Such people misuse AI and it's because of those abusers that now even if someone use AI for good will get some type of penalty.

Yes, the ones who used multiple accounts back in the days got alert after members started showing connections, but even this day those scammers get caught and so is going to be the case with the ones who misuse AI. For sometime they'll be able to use their techniques but in the end they'll make some mistakes and those mistakes are enough to destroy their reputation.

I'm not fond of you using such a generalization to make such a bold statement. Claiming that most signature campaign participants use AI is a bold move that you should be able to back-up with substantial evidence to show what you're saying. There's an official report thread where you can report those that you've found, but I haven't seen you do. Don't get me wrong, I'm not bashing at you, but saying such a thing but without names and evidence is an empty claim. There are quite a few cases that campaign participants have been caught using AI, some were higher ranked as well, but I believe that's barely a minority.

Oh, come on. He's right. The truth is that AI is now quite "human," and those who use it correctly are not stupid and know how to avoid detection. That's probably why they have ranks. You know that perfectly well . Where did the multitude of rapidly growing ranks in certain local sections come from? Even yesterday's newcomers say quite competent things about bitcoin and exchange merits. AI is really very popular on the forum, but those who get caught are those people who could not properly "understand the instructions ." They are either stupid or lazy people, or more often, both.

It's amusing how these accounts who make use of AI often have loads of crap to say but when they get caught, you see them stammering to make coherent sentences. Well that's why they employed the use of AI though, to help them cover up their inadequacies. Honestly, nothing beats being real and true to yourself because you might give the excuse of not being fluent that's why you rely on AI but then the reliance becomes too much that you can't do without it and then when you're caught, you try to make the person who caught you look stupid which is seriously not fair.

To detect AI written post will be difficult, because-

Those who directly copied, and posts from GPT or any other LLM models bear a structure that proves that they are AI written post, but the actual problem is that some people are not good at english so they normally use 'Grammarly' or Grammar or a sentence correction tool to improve the quality of the post and to also avoid mistakes in text.

So, there are two groups
1. Those who use only AI to post and reply have nothing in their dumb brain.
2. Those who write by themselves just due to some issue have to use AI or too to correct sentences or to solve any grammatical issue. Translating a post from English or any other language to thir Native language Wrote a post in their Native langiage, they translated in English with the help of AI

We should always avoid and report those who use AI directly to post or reply, and they have no idea.

But, using AI detector tools can also cause problems for those who are using the tool, who are not posting directly.


Some use system promptsprompting in AI models comanding AI models to giva e specific output format.

There are a lot of new AI models available, some are great in writting pos;t those are normapeoplele not able to catch that it is written by AI.

I also make many mistakes when I write any post so I need to correct mistakes and grammatical issues.

Whatever you said is true, the ones who know how to trick AI detectors don't really care much about the ethics, or about their reputation, they mainly use AI to increase the number of their posts because their main intention is to earn more money with multiple accounts without getting caught.

Even, if one of their accounts is caught, they can use other accounts for the purpose. AI is getting better at producing human level text with emotions, and the days aren't far when all of the detectors will fail to detect any AI generated content. The ones who're good at using AI LLMs can tweak current models to produce text that sounds genuine and human written.

I agree with Philipma1957 that no matter what we do, the forum will still have AI content but hide in shadow so the detectors might not be able to know but it'll indeed be AI written text.

We won't, that's the truth and I'm honestly somewhat okay with it. It's a phenomenon that I've acknowledged myself that can't be eradicated. People will always resort to "lazy" ways to earn money (if they are in a signature campaign) or generally to create posts in order to appear "knowledgeable". Through the AI Report thread we've enstablished that there's a "force" of some people who actively hunt such members, that alone may deter users from using AI in the first place, while others are caught early before ranking up etc. I'm totally fine with that and I acknowledge the power we have and how much we've achieved so far.