Meanwhile a sybil resistant count of 110 connections shows 4% basically unchanged for the last several weeks.  Jason at Bitcoin ocean's numbers using different methodology give 3% to "at most" 6%.  Your own post dishonestly blathers about bitcoin core "30" which is several revisions behind and is falling in usage because of nodes being upgraded to current software... and 30+ vastly outpaces bip110 nodes even using its proponents own sybil-inflated figures.

But whatever, if you want to believe such delusions it's not my place to disabuse you of them.

Again, Greg-- I'm happy to trade you as much non-110 coin as you've got for my 110 coins.   Any 110 coins are worthless to me-- because it's an authortarian controlled censor coin rather than freedom money, and I would be happy to get rid of them, but you always demure.  All evidence suggests that 110 coins have absolutely no market value, or at least a value so insubstantial that no one is even willing to transact to trade them.  (of course, the offer is open to anyone else too)

Is it time for you to admit that you don't actually believe in it and don't actually want it.. or just that you're a false flagging scamcoiner hopping to hobble bitcoin to reduce its competitiveness with other cryptocurrencies... and that you don't own any meaningful amount of bitcoin?

It's so laughable that the filterbois run a propaganda that BIP-110 will be like BIP-148. BECAUSE IT'S NOT.

Segwit already had broad consensus, community backing, with major exchanges, wallet providers and other Bitcoin services waiting for activation. PLUS the Core Developers.

BIP-110 is a controversial soft fork used as a tool for propaganda to censor transactions that filterbois don't like. - It's NOT supported by the Core Developers.

Or to be more honest knots clients will fork off the main chain with about 2% to 3% of the hash rate.

Even in the BIP itself it states the threshold is 55% as of now it's mathematically impossible to get 55% in this period.
If every single block for the next 6 days signals for it you still don't get 55%.


-Dave

@stompix, as far as I know no emergency adjustment in bitcoin exists and the blocks are retargeted every 2016 blocks. never happens. that's why BCH attached an EDA to their chain at the fork, and because it was still necessary to attach a replacement a few months after as the first attachment kept vibrating. No one has ever pointed to a retarget provision in bip110. If it doesn't have one, it simply won't have its first retarget for well over a year if the chain that is signaling is at the 2-3 percent level.

now they're going to blame bip110's failure on the fact that some troll posted that it was canceled: https://finance.yahoo.com/markets/crypto/articles/bip-110-activation-frozen-coldcard-181951882.html -- as if that would make any difference.

They're stuck in a pickle on the coldcard snafu-- because the biggest 110 influencers were some of the biggest coldcard promoters, people Kratter and Mechanic, until recently and are now walking a fine line hoping no one asks them why they were promoting it so hard but didn't lose any coins to it themselves...

Kratter did put out a video claiming that the coldcard theft happened in order to disrupt bip110 ... as if the perp didn't have eighty million more likely reasons.

Let me invite you to the live celebration of the best soft-fork in the Bitcoin history BIP-110 on Saturday (8 August 2026) at the Twitter Spaces: https://x.com/GregTonoski/status/2084176821315051571. We will discuss Bitcoin User Activated Soft-forks (UASF) superpower and witness the activation of the second one in the Bitcoin history live.

OT: Thiel proximity alone paints a suspicious character that didn't get bitcoin until 2018¹, to say nothing of BIP-110

110 is a vengeance power fantasy as much as it is anything else... letting existing miners keep their hardware on it doesn't mesh with that agenda any more than making a reasonable proposal that bitcoin core might have adopted would have.

We also don't know what fraction of that hash power is rented-- it could easily be a majority of it -- and the cost of doing so will be unsustainable once they've forked.