Thank you for making me laugh.

No, I have both BIP-110 and non-BIP-110 coins, properly splitted, and my BIP-110 coins reached a single confirmation.

non-BIP-110: https://mempool.space/tx/909b486928dc415d9b6613fcc70ccdbfb4d2f88516a040522365b95794774608
BIP-110: https://mempool.guide/tx/61ff0a1070b084d2601245056946480917a5f3efcb30fde082e7dafbd2b17158

If you want to buy/sell something between chains, then we can do a P2P trade, like people did in the old times. Nothing is confiscated, users can use any coins they want, using an altcoin is not a crime, no matter which coin you consider as an altcoin.

Bitcoin does not have smart contracts to freeze bitcoins, to confiscate bitcoins in non custodial wallets. It's a decentralized blockchain, that is different than centralized altcoin blockchains or tokens that can be frozen, confiscated in non custodial wallets.

It's practical possible with altcoins, tokens but impossible with Bitcoin blockchain and bitcoins stored in non custodial wallets.
PSA: Most Stablecoins Can Be Frozen, Even in Your Own Wallets.
Can stablecoins frozen by issuers?
Can stablecoins be frozen? Blacklisting explained (2026).

Two days later, still two blocks 


20 Exahash means 1 year and a few weeks, this will probably mean 90% of the transactions will be dropped since they will already be confirmed on the other chain and not kept being broadcasted,  the mempool will be flooded with just the highest payments from the other chain and the poor guys who actually want to make a transaction of 110 coins will have to overpay x10 to x50 times more.

The thing is so idiotically constructed it will just screw 110 coiners twice for nothing.


Bitcoin doesn't,  Luke110coin does!

Absolutely, positively any crypto, including Bitcoin, can be confiscated by a government.

Governments have a backdoor into all cryptos, and it's called, "the rubber hose attack". This attack consists of finding the person with the keys necessary to obtain ownership of the crypto balance, and... beating them with a rubber hose applying various forms of pressure until the person relinquishes the keys. Once they do that, the money is confiscated.

Bitcoin is no different than keeping your money in a bank account or hiding the money in your basement. Governments go after people, not technical systems.

It works only if your private keys are enough, to move the coins. But some of them are locked on contracts, where knowing the private key will give you no advantage. For example: the private key to all of these addresses is equal to one. And nobody collected all of them.

Also, people can have coins, locked for example to "<timestamp> OP_CHECKLOCKTIMEVERIFY OP_DROP <pubkey> OP_CHECKSIG". Then, you can have the key, but you won't move the coins earlier, than the timestamp will let you.

Really? Then tell me, how to program my dollars to be movable, only if two out of three people will agree to do so, and only after a given time?

The government cant compel you to give them only if the government  knows that you have it.

How will the government compel you to give them something they dont know you own?

In addition to being coerced into relinquishing your keys, hard forks and even soft forks could render specific spending script invalid and that's how ones Bitcoin can become unspendable when that topic or subject of confiscation arises.

Do you mean by confiscation something like that where you are hacking or taking away someone's Bitcoin without knowing the security system? If it was possible, people would have confiscated Bitcoin from many lost wallets long ago and brought it to a wallet.

But how do governments of different countries confiscate Bitcoin? It is basically that the investor or holder of Bitcoin is forced to transfer Bitcoin. In that case, only after being put in a torture cell and subjected to severe mental pressure and beatings, they are forced to give the security of the wallet and thus the government can confiscate Bitcoin.

Why not? At least it is consistent: he is also in a minority in other areas, so it is not the first time: https://blog.lopp.net/knot-a-serious-project/

So, if he can be in a small group of Sedevacantists, then he can also be in a small group of BIP-110 supporters. You can consider it irrational, but at least it is consistent. And now, if he really believes in soft-forks being superior, then he would introduce new changes in a soft-fork way, by using weak blocks, fractional confirmations, and allowing the network to gradually drop the difficulty through years or decades, or whatever it takes. Or, he can always do a hard-fork, but it would simply send a signal, that all existing BIP-110 nodes are irrelevant, and they have to upgrade to new rules.

See? It is moving. That way or another, it will have its own chain, with a hard-fork, soft-fork, or whatever else their community will come up with. So, does anyone want to buy any BIP-110 coins?