I mean I understand they are checking things because this is not just about "a few bucks". We are talking 6.75 BTC here, not mbtc or something. But no matter the amount there should be some form of communication, in here as well as on casinoguru. Neither is happening which is obviously not a good sign, and their first reply in this thread was AI generated which first is ridiculous and second is against forum rules as well.
Royse is a solid campaign manager and hopefully he will look more deep into this. The numbers they provide make no sense and are in no way worth a flag. The guy played for big money, spent big money, and got lucky. What's the problem with that? If they think ANY foul play is happening then they should contact the game provider so they check it. Just bringing up numbers of what he played and how he made his bets is not enough reason to withhold winnings like that.

Yet, the campaign manager chose to ignore all the scam accusations against them, but instead chose to focus on the op's betting patterns. The bias is palpable.

for example at Casino Guru site, you can see already two Unresolved complaints. But seems you want to make impression that this site do not have scam practice with gamblers who play here.

In result casino representee do not said, what term is which rule was violated.

Everything the casino provided here consists merely of some figures and statistics regarding my bets. That’s correct—I played the *All Lucky Clovers 100* slot by BGaming, and I won. Furthermore, I had even greater luck while playing the *Gift Rush* slot. Why didn't they choose to publish that as well? The slot’s stated RTP is 97%. It’s not entirely clear, but it seems the casino representative was implying that I somehow influenced the slot’s mechanics, causing the RTP to increase.

Casino representative, please post the statistics for *Gift Rush* here; I think people would be interested to see how my luck played out there. It would also serve as good promotion for the provider, BGaming, since I believe I hit a significant win.

Yet when you wrote you have seen several "threads" about them this can only mean in the forum. Unless you have another forum where somebody else than OP posted this makes no sense. Trustpilot is a different story.
Talking about trustpilot, there is even a warning about the casino since there have been a high amount of fake (probably bought) reviews they deleted, which is not a good sign as well.


Dude you need to chill and get your facts straight. I have called out the site several times in this thread alone. Read everything and not only the one single thing that (for no reason) triggers you. 
You are attacking one of the few users with a decent member level that actually tried to support your claim. But well, guess I won't support the flag then. Good luck finding support with that kind of behavior.

How many times does a scammer have to scam in your world to become a scammer?

They explained already, "Under clause 6.12 and our internal risk policy, the account has been permanently closed and the balance withheld. We stand by this decision."

So to pay 500000 euro winnings is internal risk, so they need to steal those money. Soryy ))

---

But if you will check 6.12 from theirs terms, it is "6.12. Automated tools and bots
The use of automated tools or bots to place bets or spin reels is permitted solely for the purpose of standard gameplay. Any use of automated tools that involves attempts to exploit game mechanics, manipulate outcomes, or generate invalid requests is strictly prohibited. The Casino reserves the right to suspend or permanently block any account where automated tool usage is deemed to violate these Terms, at its sole discretion. The Casino may also act on notifications received from game providers regarding abnormal request volumes or irregular activity patterns associated with a player's account."


So, this casino scam is absolutely absurd.


These scammers are also very stupid and lazy. They can’t even find 10 minutes to describe their scam in a somewhat coherent way.

[mod note: merged consecutive posts]

supported the flag.

welcoming others to do the same.

Are we still a community of users here in bitcointalk or we are trying to scam between us? Or for a few bucks we can start to endorse any possible scam?
Would we allow to see promoted 1xbit (that has exactly the same issues) or we can stop to admire blindly some internet scammer?

Pay attention, if you verify the post history  It's evident that this website could bring many issues even to users that are promoting it...  
It's a couple of weeks we are reading the bullshit of BiggerZ and Royse777 about this scam... nonsense post with AI, fake traffic, fake reviewa, fake jackpot, fake fournament, it's an honey pot no more nor less.


I am still "surprised" that despite the asthonishing amount of evidence of scam/malpractice/incompetence those users has decide to no step back - they have no idea to make due diligence before.

The list of accusation is impressive, it would be now the last of the task to endorse them and advocating for a casino that has all of these un-addressed issues.

So let's call the things with their name. This is a scam, promoting here "being the campaign manager" would make AB de Royse777 a scam promoter.

There is an high risk to get scammed by this service and this kind of promotions must deserve a red tag IMMEDIATELY before someone reading such "blatant" promotion would decide to lose some money.