One thing Ive been wondering about lately:
If youre holding BTC for the long term but suddenly need liquidity, selling it feels like you are about to lose your position and might never get it back at that price before you buy back in.
Borrowing against it makes more sense in theory, you get to keep the BTC, access liquidity, repay the loan, get your BTC back.
But the tricky part is doing this without introducing unnecessary custodians, bridges or wrapped BTC.
If native BTC can eventually be used as collateral while staying on Bitcoin, that could open up a pretty interesting lending market.
Would you personally borrow against BTC you plan to hold long term, or would you rather just sell a small portion?
I understand the attraction of borrowing against BTC, but I think using bitcoin as a collateral comes with a serious high risks that shouldnt be overlooked. Bitcoin is highly volatile, and we cant say it less. If bitcoin drops sharply, the lender will want to require more collateral or liquidate your BTC. And you may later end up losing the bitcoin you were trying to to avoid selling, especially during a market crash.
For me, if i urgently needed liquidity, i would prefer selling a fraction of my bitcoin than taking a debt again my asset that can actually move 20-30% or even more in a short period of time. Selling a fraction of it would give up some bitcoin exposure, but also remove the risk of interest, liquidation and being forced to sell at a bad price. Bitcoin may just be excellent as a long term asset but not collateral for debt.