The notorious claim that "Bitcoin is dead" is incorrect in several respects. Bitcoin bears no resemblance to anything usually referred to as a dead coin. Not at all.
However, in one sense, this claim might also be correct...
Bitcoin is dead in the same sense as a Nobel Prize-winning poet. It is at the pinnacle of fame and can be a great source of inspiration. But it is not something to believe in or to bet on.
I feel there is a grain of truth in that claim.
Bro, these dead callers have been wrong for the last fifteen years, and no matter what they say and even who they are, Bitcoin didn't care about any of them.
Although you used Nobel poetry here for some resemblance, I think, like poetry, Bitcoin is not finished. Like, where there is nothing left to produce in poetry, in BTC there are many things to produce, like the monetary properties are not finished. It increased every time a new person came to know about Bitcoin.
Then they invest, and they bring more people. Fame, hype plays more role in a bull run, and that's where we call everyone to be wary of FOMO, while it is FOMO that drives the price haha. Scarcity is also an important part here, but it always has room to be priced in, so I look for trend or FOMO usually.
