Adoption does occur, but not with the use of Bitcoin. There may be government officials who promote Bitcoin as an asset that has hedging capabilities and can be considered as an investment asset. But of course, you know that is not the case with its use as a means of payment.
We really cannot see the future. Everything can change quickly, including the direction of government policy.

For some reason I have also nursed what the legacy was too, and honestly one of the legacy was the price, for some good 17 years bitcoin has been able to proved free permissions to move your value freely no such as bailout, or some banks system maintenance….and this was something some person have never experienced before…

Well I think I might be a little bit worried about the second part which you made mention of this generation,which it looks like Bitcoin is just turning into another ETF ticker, and just you have said if people don’t hold there IOUs and don’t touch wallets or they never run a node then we all have missed the point because it now looks like we just rebranded the banks with extra steps….

Bitcoin is and will still be a revolutionary digital monetary system the world has ever seen and experience. So what then will Bitcoin leave for the future and is still doing now. For me, I will stand on the option Bitcoin gave people to send and receive money. That one alone is what revolutionarised the whole monetary system completely. So you don't have to rely on one system to send and receive money.

I think most people gets blinded by the price charts but the real deal is just how Bitcoin changed the way we think about money
Like before Bitcoin nobody even questioned if we needed banks, Now self custody is just a normal thing, Even if some other tech takes over down the road, you can't unring this bell. It proved digital scarcity is real and that’s what's gonna stick.

Bitcoin may not only not be another currency, but an actual blueprint for a system of money that is open and independently verifiable. That's important because if future systems can steal some of Bitcoin's ideas without replacing Bitcoin. Although the actual implementation of the financial system might be entirely different, open-source code and self-custody with public verification of settlement could have an impact on the way people design financial systems. Bitcoin's impact on the world could be more in terms of how many systems embrace the ideas it illustrated, rather than by its market cap.

Actually we dont need to pity anyone who dislikes bitcoin for personal reasons. Bitcoin has been around for about seventy years, and some people still refuse to participate despite everything that has happened in the space about its rewarding system and the benefits that come with owning bitcoin. We all have different points of view, which I respect, and you must accept other people's choices based on what makes them comfortable.

However, it is not a flex that you do not want to invest in bitcoin; you may simply be denying yourself a great opportunity to achieve financial independence in the near future. Bitcoin's price may not be a big deal in the future, but having your funds in your own custody without relying on any company or authority to move funds will always be a big deal; the other features will be secondary benefits.

Spot on. Bitcoin laid the groundwork for an entirely new financial ecosystem. Even though it comes with the wild west of thousands of shitcoins and speculative projects, the core technology and the community it built are unmatched. It changed how the world views money forever

It's left a common knowledge that thanks to its limited supply and scarcity that its value will remain. While for fiat, those who don't care about economy and things happening in it have given them an idea.

That whenever the government prints more money, it adds to the damage to every citizen that contributes to the inflation.

Investments that have scarcity are way better and it's not only offered by the banks because bitcoin is an all in one asset.

Countries like El Salvador and Central African Republic have accepted Bitcoin as a legal tender with other countries permitting Bitcoin operations under varying conditions, yet Bitcoin has this much publicity already. So imagine when countries like the United States and other countries in the UN accept Bitcoin as a legal tender, what would be the possible outcome of bitcoin?

Bitcoin has a lot more potential to do ten times of its original price, it's not a debate but time will tell. The largest effect Bitcoin can have is nothing compared to what we have already seen, Bitcoin is here to stay.

Of the two countries you mentioned, El Salvador and CAR, they have already revoked Bitcoin's status as legal tender in their countries due to pressure from the IMF.. but even so, Bitcoin is still widely used in El Salvador, and they are even slowly accumulating Bitcoin every day.

As for the chance of Bitcoin becoming legal tender in the US or other countries, I don't think the chance of that happening is that high because there are a lot of considerations when making Bitcoin legal tender, and central banks as well as the IMF are very unhappy about it.. the most likely scenario is that Bitcoin will only become a strategic reserve, like what some countries have already done.. and even if more countries make Bitcoin their strategic reserve, it could have a significant impact on Bitcoin.