I looked this up, and it turns out Larry Fink is often left off such lists because he said in 2017 that Bitcoin is a "money laundering index." In my opinion, this is clearly a negative reaction, which essentially evokes negative rhetoric, just like "Bitcoin is dead." Oh well, whatever.

He became a good indicator to be honest. And whenever these personalities are saying such a remark negatively about Bitcoin, you observe and see what happens next.

We can understand their point. They're not used to new technologies and new assets that have become acceptable globally.

And that's okay if they can't accept bitcoin or invest in it. But, we see the shift of the hearts of some of them that they're doing the opposite from the words they speak in the public.

So it's a matter of their personal interest and how they influence the market, they're in money game so they know more about it.

2011 was when Mt. Gox was hacked and had 647,000 Bitcoin stolen. I wouldn’t have blamed anybody for having a pessimistic outlook after that incident. In hindsight that statement seems absurd because of how much Bitcoin has grown in the time since. Institutional adoption of Bitcoin was only a fantasy back then and you might have even been called delusional for thinking that it would one day become reality. Now it’s the complete opposite.

Now it’s the complete opposite. Anybody saying Bitcoin is dead or is going to die seems like a charlatan or a crazy person. Sometimes those detractors get platformed by mainstream outlets, especially after there’s a major price decline, but the anti-Bitcoin propagandists always end up being proven wrong.