I'm sure they are going to resolve all the issues that can harm their platform. They've got a campaign manager who's managing their campaign, and they are spending money.
The money spent will be useless if their reputation is questionable so far. Based on what I see, they are actively addressing the issues, and they stand by their decision. The complainant is free to challenge that and bring the case to a party that can fairly decide on the case.

The big difference between them and the two mentioned sites is that BiggerZ has a profile on these mediator platforms, the other 2 were so small didn't even have the time to establish themselves on such platforms..

Btw the software they are running should be based on Betby meaning they spent some $$ for this unlike the other custom platforms used  by them only.

Noted..

Online casinos are very popular all over the world and there are a lot of gamblers who are attracted by the big bonus offers on new platforms and there are many gamblers in this forum who gamble on new platforms. And for this reason, a lot of casino platforms come to this forum to promote. And many sites are also scamming. One thing is that in this forum, signature casinos, which pay a large amount every week, take big ranks and reputable members, due to which those platforms can create hype very quickly. And many people easily go there to gamble by promoting through reputable members. However, now the way various casino sites are cheating, in the new situation, a very large amount should not be deposited on a platform for safety.

I don't see it that way. What I see is that they seem to be copying the design used by stake. Regarding promotions, it doesn't seem like they've been credited yet.
Their licenses are also different. I still trust Biggerz. They're currently adapting. Let's give them time to show the potential of Biggerz Casino.

Not really wise to rely on someone else's judgement instead of your own regardless of who that person is.

You people are way too naive. Have no idea why you would trust a relatively new site like BiggerZ that quickly especially when there's a huge pending scam accusation against them. They can adapt and show their potential by properly resolving that accusation. Think!

Base on the information here https://bookmakerstats.com/bookmaker/biggerz/ they are not a new site.

Also those existing cases they have is truly quiet disturbing, so best to push them act with those cases. Since its not good to just blindly trust them because they have sig campaign and the one handles it is a reputable member.

They already know what people like to happen here. If they follow it, for sure they could get the full trust of this community.

Lmao, even a x10 wagering requirement is still a moonshot completing it considering how small the bonus amounts that doesn’t give much room for Risk of Ruin.

This kind of bonus is ridiculous and I don’t have any interest playing on a casino that playing hard to get on small amount. What’s more if big amount is involved here. 

You’re on the regular bonus requirements however this particular one is just the 5$ small bonus that is frequently given by the casino to try their platform.

Usually, it has no wagering requirements or small wagering requirements consistent with how small the amount is. They just make it in limited amounts to avoid being abused by players.

But as usual, their bonus their rules. 

it's not really bad, some of casino have more than 35x wager requirement for bonus winning. but if casino agree to reduce the wager requirement, it will be good for all. if most member here feel it too hard to be achieved, then this promotion maybe need to change the wager requirement.

---

can admin give us more info about this bonus, is this still available or not. maybe if there is another follow up information it will be helpful for member that recently joined this casino.

For me, it is actually worse.
When I changed the multiplier to 2.0x on the dice game, the win chance became 48.5%. FYI - I did not create an account yet. I just tried to open the game without logging in and tried to check the settings. With a 2x multiplier, the win chance is supposed to be almost 50%, as you said in your post. So, I assume you are correct about the false advertisement thing. They should either remove the claim that the game has no house edge or adjust the game itself.

@BiggerZ.com, you should take a look at this. Also, it's worth checking the other games. Make sure you serve what you claim.