Wow, that was fast, and it worked as promised!

To be honest, it's been quite a while since I've seen a promising new project announced on Bitcointalk that has received this much positive feedback. It's also good to see you actively responding to community concerns. I hope you keep it up and continue delivering on your promises.

Out of curiosity, I decided to give AnonChange a try and swapped 50 USDT for BTC. The whole process was smooth as silk, and the exchange rate was pretty good too!

One thing did confuse me a little, though.

I was sending USDT from another exchange, which charged a 0.6 USDT withdrawal fee. Since I had entered 50 USDT as the swap amount on AnonChange, I wasn't sure whether sending exactly 50 USDT would result in only 49.4 USDT arriving.

Would that cause the transaction to be rejected for being below the requested amount? Or would it be processed with a reduced payout or refunded?

Rather than taking any chances, I sent 50.6 USDT to make sure the full 50 USDT would arrive.

A small suggestion: It would be helpful to add a clear note during the swap process reminding users to account for any withdrawal fees charged by the sending exchange. This would avoid confusion, especially for first-time users.

Anyway, I successfully received 0.000573556 BTC. The transaction was fast, straightforward, and hassle-free!

So far, so good. Keep up the good work, and I hope AnonChange  can earn the community's trust.

~
I was sending USDT from another exchange, which charged a 0.6 USDT withdrawal fee. Since I had entered 50 USDT as the swap amount on AnonChange, I wasn't sure whether sending exactly 50 USDT would result in only 49.4 USDT arriving.

Would that cause the transaction to be rejected for being below the requested amount? Or would it be processed with a reduced payout or refunded?

Rather than taking any chances, I sent 50.6 USDT to make sure the full 50 USDT would arrive.

A small suggestion: It would be helpful to add a clear note during the swap process reminding users to account for any withdrawal fees charged by the sending exchange. This would avoid confusion, especially for first-time users.
~

The idea may not be bad, but it seems wrong to me, at least when it comes to privacy-focused (instant) exchanges.
Saving the deposit address would require some kind of log or similar record, and that is enough to cancel the no-log policy or no holding user data.

I would certainly always trust the wallet that I control more than leaving it all to a third-party service. At least to the greatest extent.

We're taking inspiration from exchanges like exch.cx, which demonstrated the appeal of a more autonomous, privacy-focused swapping experience. Our long-term plan is to expand our reserves and support greater transaction volumes without requiring users to contact us manually. We want to scale responsibly while maintaining the level of privacy and reliability we're building the platform around.

I appreciate you bringing this up because it's a valid concern, especially as we promote AnonChange and attract more users. We know liquidity availability is an important part of building trust, and it's something we'll need to keep improving as we move beyond beta.

Thanks again for the constructive feedback and for using AnonChange. We genuinely appreciate it!