Now it seems that we are focusing more on Bitcoin as a store of value than on Bitcoin as a payment method. I feel that governments have ruined Bitcoins transaction side with their regulations.
Oh yes, the first thing you should look at when your product fails to solve some problem is... blame the government.

The reality here is that Bitcoin is far too slow and too expensive to realistically handle any significant portion of the world's daily payments, and
there are far better products that handle this instead.
Bitcoin is not now, nor will ever be a mechanism for mainstream payments. That is not a government conspiracy, that's just computer architecture.
For example capital gains tax in some countries says that even if Bitcoin is used for payments Bitcoin can be taxed if Bitcoins value has gone up. So of encouraging people to spend Bitcoin these regulations seem to encourage people to hold Bitcoin.
LOL, you rant about Bitcoin not taking off as a payment and you blame... a tax law designed for
investments. Pick a lane, man.

Do you think Satoshi would be happy with Bitcoin today or would Satoshi be disappointed that Bitcoins original purpose as peer-, to-peer electronic cash is no longer the focus?
"Satoshi", who is most likely a US government employee or group of employees, probably doesn't care one way or another. He/they are not allowed to spend their Bitcoin and will never profit from it nor will they lose money if it goes down in price.
Bitcoin was created back when digital currencies were illegal, and because of that the peer-to-peer architecture was necessary to evade law enforcement. Now that digital currencies are perfectly legal, this architecture is no longer necessary. Hence the original design goal of Bitcoin is no longer relevant. Hence this would be like asking the inventors of Coca Cola, which they invented to be a cough syrup, if how they felt about it being used as a soft drink. I suspect their answer would be:
¯\_(ツ)_/¯